Is “Dorner” a Patsy to Justify Drone Strikes on U.S. Soil?

From http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

Totally new facts about Chris Dorner

Keep in mind while reading the following, that the censorship problems in my mail box are ongoing, with a high percentage of what I am getting being obvious attempts to get me to publish B.S. However, this really adds up to what we are seeing, so I am going to run with it.

According to what is arriving in my mail box, he NEVER KILLED OR THREATENED ANYONE. He did write portions of the manifesto I have posted, but his original manifesto had nothing about getting revenge ANYWHERE BUT IN COURT, and VIA EXPOSURE. It’s most likely a frame up folks, TO JUSTIFY DRONE USE IN AMERICA, AND BURY THE CRIMES OF THE LAPD.

All links sent to my mailbox regarding Dorner are dead. He is posting and links are being sent, but they are killing his posts quickly. According to him, he knew he got framed and ran for his life. They want him dead because he was going to expose corruption. Now we have the Fed using him to justify a drone strike, where he will never be allowed to testify. NO WONDER WHY THE COPS ARE DOING NOTHING BUT SHOOTING, AND ALREADY NAILED TWO LATINAS AND A SURFER. HE CANNOT BE ALLOWED A DAY IN COURT, OR THE SCAM WILL BE REVEALED.

Furthermore, HIS POSTS ARE NOT HAPPENING IN HIS NAME, ALMOST AS IF HE IS TELLING PEOPLE DORNER IS NOT HIS REAL NAME. A FAKE LAST NAME WOULD WORK GREAT FOR DORNER = DRONER.

I would like to ask the LAPD to BACK OFF, ONCE UP ON THIS WEB SITE YOU LOST THE BATTLE FOR PUBLIC OPINION BECAUSE THIS SITE, THOUGH THE READERSHIP IS ONLY IN THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS, GETS READ BY MEDIA PEOPLE WHO REPEAT AND MIRROR WHAT IS HERE, AND FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. BACK OFF ON THE DRONE USE, YOUR IMAGE CANNOT SURVIVE IT

So what does this all mean?

Consider the following – He probably got word of that altered manifesto and ran. This logic is supported by the fact that in the manifesto we all know of, it and its accompanying story had and would have people dead. IF DRONER WAS GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAID, HE NEVER WOULD HAVE RUN TO THE MOUNTAINS TO HIDE.

It is super easy to hide right in front of everyone, in the city, and if he had really planned to do what his manifesto said, he would have chosen a place to lay low and gone there between killings. Once in the safe hideout NO ONE is going to find you, provided you do not leave. THAT IS HOW IT IS DONE and THAT IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED. If you are going to go hunting YOU DO NOT RUN AWAY FROM YOUR TARGET.

What really happened?

The answer is obvious folks. He knew they were out to get him so he ran for the hills, ended up in a ritzy place he did not want to end up in, hit the logging trails, snapped an axle, and since the truck was worthless at that point anyway he burned it. IF HE WAS A CRAZED KILLER, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BURNED HIS GUNS ALONG WITH THE TRUCK, and that is even if he had any – I would place a fair bet that the burned guns is just food for a good dog wagging. Gotta feed that dog, it´s a big one. What kind of stupid logic is that? The lying scamming media forgets all about the fact that some of us can think and instead of answering common sense, they just spin a story about him burning his guns. Folks, THAT is a fault of logic as transparant as the one about an afghan on dialysis who totally flustered American defenses a few years ago, and in the process helped Larry Silverstein cash in.

Put your thinking caps on people, and don´t fall for this ludicrous story, I actually ate it for a while, until they got the drones out, at that point it was becoming obvious. The final kicker was in the mail today.

There is an overwhelming probability that an innocent man is being used to push a political agenda of legitimizing drone strikes on American soil by a totally corrupted police force and the Obamanoid, you know, they monitor all of our computers now and they probably saw his manifesto stating he was going to bring them to justice in court. During the days it would have taken to type it and deliver it, they probably said HA HA, HERE IS OUR PATSY, WE NEED TO GET RID OF HIM ANYWAY.

Dorner = Droner?

My guess is as good as yours. Interesting parallel indeed. Spooky. What better way to do a toe dip in the pihrana pool to see if Americans will go for it. If you do, your ignorance makes you worthy of being the next target. And I have a little observation for you –

The first, original 10 page manifesto, which was released at least 20 hours before the proven phony redacted added edited manifesto, has “DRONER” pegged as a staunch conservative. The 20 page dietribe released hours later, has him pegged as a liberal. Why two opposites? Because if the real objective of this whole thing – if it is another wag the dog psy op like Sandy Hook, and the real objective is to gain acceptance in the American psyche for drone use, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A TARGET THAT REPRESENTS EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY. That way, it will be OK to drone snipe ANYONE.

America is SO, OH SO SCREWED! Lock and load, If this is the tactic, we need 50 million “droners” out there, to make such an attack method too risky to even think about.

Advertisements

One thought on “Is “Dorner” a Patsy to Justify Drone Strikes on U.S. Soil?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s