This is to permalink an article by Jim Stone at http://www.jimstonefreelance.com
The original Fukushima report is HERE
Two years on, and no one has managed to find a collapsed or leaning building outside the tsunami zone in Sendai, the city hardest hit by a 9.0.
All we have is TSUNAMI DAMAGE. SHOW ME THE EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE. ZERO COLLAPSED AND ZERO LEANING BUILDINGS OUTSIDE THE TSUNAMI ZONE EQUALS NO 9.0, 8.0, OR EVEN A 7.0.
Included in this additional report, posted March 13 2013, I have the OFFICIAL USGS charts that show Sendai, according to the USGS, had peak ground accelerations in excess of 3.7 G´s.
Folks, 0.35 g´s is considered adequate to possibly collapse a skyscraper when it is rated to survive an 8.0, yet the USGS said that INLAND, NORTH OF SENDAI the ground thrust was 12.7 g´s. Sendai proper had, according to the USGS, a MINIMUM G-force exerted on it of 3.7 across every square foot of the city, which is flatulent B.S, and fortunately the Japanese seismic readings farther down this page confirm that nothing on the Japanese mainland ANYWHERE should have fallen, provided it could withstand a 6.7 richter reading, and the REAL maximum ground acceleration ANYWHERE on Japan was in fact below 0.15 g’s. Where did the USGS get 12.7 from? The original charts from both the scamming USGS and the “please help spread the truth” Japanese seismologists are here, right now, on the front page. Compare them, look at the photos of perfectly un damaged Japanese towns and cities as the tsunami arrives, and decide for yourself – WHO IS LYING, THE JAPANESE, OR THE USGS?
After Sandy Hook, do you think ANY mainstream news outlet would tell the truth about this – Japan’s 911? The original Fukushima report laid the scam perpetrated by the USGS bare – the USGS has been usurped by an enemy and is now being used to front phony geological data for political purposes.
The scam of a 9.0 is so transparent that even the smallest kitten scratch on the surface of the topic lays waste to the official story; it takes a real stroke of sheeple style blindness to overlook the fact that it was ALL TSUNAMI DAMAGE because the earthquake never happened as stated at all. And if there was no significant quake, WHERE ON EARTH DID THAT TSUNAMI COME FROM?
THIS is the official USGS quake report, which shows the five top ground accelerations measured, the USGS clearly claims that a peak ground acceleration of 12.7 g’s happened at station MYG004, which is 70 KM inland, yet puts the epicenter out in the ocean, where there are no stations to record it. The station closest to the reported epicenter, which the USGS painstakingly omits, shows that on the Japanese coast nearest the purported “epicenter”, the quake registered a 5.63 on the richter scale which corresponds to a total ground thrust acceleration of approximately 0.08 G’s. Look at this USGS report carefully, which puts the ground acceleration at station MYG004 at over 12 g’s.To put this all in perspective, a quake that produces even 1 g of ground acceleration is considered to be one that virtually NO skyscraper, highway over pass or bridge can survive. Why then did a 12 G monster do virtually nothing at all where it was measured INLAND, FAR AWAY FROM THE OCEAN?
The picture below is NOT the USGS report, CLICK THE LINK ABOVE or Here, the USGS report is a PDF.
Take a look at the REAL richter readings in the photo below, which were provided by the various seismic monitoring agencies in Japan, which prove beyond all doubt the USGS lied.
Furthermore, I got numerous shill backstabs claiming that no damage happened inland because the ocean absorbed the quake. If the ocean really could absorb a quake (it cannot) it would be irrelevant if the USGS charts were true, charts which show peak ground accelerations of 12 G’s, 3.18 g’s, and 2.7 g’s, ALL TOTALLY APOCALYPTIC READINGS, happening hundreds of miles apart ON THE JAPANESE MAINLAND. The lack of damage outside the tsunami zone proves beyond all doubt that the USGS lied with their charts, and is therefore complicit in the lie that gave creedence to the Fukushima disaster.