Fear about Fukushima and its “poisoning of the Pacific” is rampant these days. On Facebook, some of my “truther” friends get angry if I dare to question the reality of a nuclear apocalypse looming in and over the Pacific.
The term “fear porn” has gained a lot of traction, and in this instance I can see why: intelligent people have become so addicted to their Pacific Ocean horror fixation, they refuse to evaluate any data that might contradict it.
Are there dying animal populations? Should residents of the Pacific Northwest be concerned? Does the Pacific Ocean contain large amounts of radioactive material? While the answer to all these questions is “Yes”, there is, as usual, a lot more to know.
Mainstream media outlets peddle the lie that all four obliterated reactor containments at Fukushima remain unbreached. Meanwhile, the so-called “alternative media” has been hammering truth seekers with dire claims that are equally misleading.
These two false scenarios – one, everything is under control, and two, the Pacific Ocean has been destroyed – constitute the usual goalposts by which people are routinely deceived, manipulated, and distracted from reality.
Usually, the goalpost dialectic leads the public down a predetermined path of brainwashed opinion, and reality is somewhere outside the confines of the posts. In this case, however, reality is not only outside the goalposts, but in between them as well.
Let’s look at the latter reality first.
Yes, there was a starfish apocalypse. Dead starfish by the millions littered the ocean floor off the British Columbian coast. Their arms were falling off. Their guts were gooshing out. When marine biologists collected them in tanks for analysis, they sometimes turned to jelly before they reached the laboratory.
“Alternative news” sites such as ENEnews.com promptly attributed the die-off to radiation from Fukushima. Droves of truthers, already terrified by reports of radioactive tuna and Google Maps images showing the killer radiation overtaking the Pacific like a psychedelic oil slick, fell for this bit of disinformation hook, line, and sinker.
The truth is that die-offs are a regular occurrence in nature. Die-offs happen when populations outstrip food supply; malnourishment leads to starvation and, more importantly, disease, which quickly propagates, effecting a population crash.
After the crash, the survivors, presumably the fittest, enjoy less competition for a recovering food supply, and the population rebounds.
Dr. Craig McClain, Assistant Director of Science for the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, identifies the syndrome that caused the die-off, and gives three reasons why it had nothing to do with Fukushima: (1) as an observed phenomenon, it predates Fukushima by 3 – 15 years; (2) it also occurs on the East Coast; and (3), other forms of life in the region remained unaffected.
Far from being unusual events, animal die-offs happen all the time, and normally go unremarked by all but the scientists who monitor them. Unscrupulous outlets ENEnews.com and Rense.com, among many others, are now hauling reports of them into the alternative media limelight and attributing them to Fukushima fallout without presenting a shred of evidence.
In doing so, they spread not only disinformation, but needless fear.
There have been claims of high Geiger counter readings in the Pacific Northwest.
According to Jim Stone, the engineer and ex-NSA analyst who proved that Fukushima was an act of environmental terrorism, the nuke that destroyed Reactor 3 did indeed produce particles that were blown eastward and are most likely to end up in North American riverbeds.
That isn’t good, but neither is it the end of the world, when one considers the many Cold War nuclear test detonations, one factor in the cancer rate explosion of the 20th century.
This article from Geigercounter.com traces high readings in California to naturally radioactive sand. How many amateurs with Geiger counters are erroneously jumping to Fukushima conclusions?
Background radiation is not uniform. Naturally occurring hot spots vary widely in intensity. In some parts of Iran, people thrive in radioactive norms much higher than any in the United States.
It makes sense to take the Geiger counter reports with several grains of salt.
Stone makes another good point. In Washington State, police cars are equipped with Geiger counters, which still sometimes detectradiotherapy patients. The background radiation in that region has not spiked because of Fukushima; otherwise, the cops’ Geiger counters would be jammed and useless for detecting cancer patients.
Some particles from the obliterated core of Reactor 3 have found their way to North America, but the reality does not begin to approach the hype.
“The Pacific Ocean is DYING!”
This is where people have been getting most emotional, and understandably so. We love whales and dolphins, and a whole lot of us enjoy seafood too. How much more catastrophic can you get, short of a planetary mass extinction event?
But this claim, that “The Pacific Ocean is dying”, is the most tenuous of them all.
The Pacific took its worst hit when Reactor 3 exploded, sending a portion of its fuel downwind over the waters. The rest will sit on Japanese land, making much of it uninhabitable, for as long as Japan remains above sea level.
Water happens to be an ideal radiation sink. Even gamma rays cannot penetrate more than two and a half feet of seawater. It takes only a fuel pool with a little water to soak up all the radiation from many reactor cores. Meanwhile, the Pacific Ocean occupies fully 30% of Earth’s surface.
Consider also the many nuclear tests conducted in the Pacific during the Cold War. In that context, are we to believe that a bit of fuel from one reactor core could destroy the entire ocean?
Even had Reactor 3’s entire core been ejected into the water, the idea that it could poison the entire ocean is ludicrous.
If you are freaked out by the hype, I suggest that you consider the possibility that you are getting roped in by a fear porn campaign designed to … do what?
Now we come to the reality outside the goalposts.
Stone thinks that the disinformation is to divert truthers’ attention from the real issues surrounding Fukushima: that (1) the disaster on 3/11/11 was a coordinated attack on Japan, (2) the majority of environmental damage outside Japan came in the immediate wake of that attack, and (3) the most serious issue is all the expelled fuel still strewn around Reactor 3’s destroyed containment. So lethal is that debris that not even robots can survive proximity to it. Safe disposal remains untenable.
I think the “elites” enjoy scaring the masses. In a sense, they feed on it. Fear is an excellent tool for keeping people’s minds in chains, especially when they happen to be a demographic (frequenters of “alternative” media) who are consciously trying to shake off those chains and become mentally free.
Stone’s report proving that 3/11/11 was an act of war is available in PDF format here.
I clicked. I waited. The article wouldn’t load. I stepped outside for some fresh air. When I came back, the server had timed out. I clicked again and again. Again and again, the same result. I told my friend it would have to wait for morning and went to bed.
I am very glad that The Rebel’s server didn’t let me see this article, because it would have ruined my sleep. In it, the author, Andrew MacGregor, accuses my friend Jim Stone of being a murderer. Along the way to this libelous conclusion, he misrepresents and distorts Jim’s work. It is so ridiculous that I do not want to devote the time and effort necessary to answer it; but answer it I must. The only question now is, where to begin.
I guess I’ll start with the most nonsensical of Mr. MacGregor’s claims: that American investigative journalist Jim Stone is actually Australian investigative journalist Joe Vialls, who was actually Israeli Mossad agent Ari Ben Menashe.
First, I direct your attention to the following article, in which the writer testifies that Joe Vialls was a devoted family man and denies that he doubled as anyone else:
So, you may ask, how are you to believe that the fellow in the interview was really Jim Stone? Well, if you really don’t want to accept the easiest and most obvious conclusion — that the voice and speech mannerisms exactly match every other interview he ever gave, and he is in full command of the research and information released under that name, so it must be him — then maybe you’ll take my word for it.
You see, I know that’s Jim Stone because I spent dozens of hours talking with him on Skype after he made his escape to Mexico.
“Well,” you might then say, “but what about you, Mr. James Farganne? I googled you, and Ken Adachi says that isn’t your real name, and that you and Stone are a tag-team psy op duo and blah blah yadda yadda ya …”
Since his idiotic libel recently caused me some hardship in establishing a new connection with a fellow activist, I am going to take Ken Adachi to task in this article as well. Here is Adachi’s drivel, which I will not re-read because I just got back from my nice little trip to the coast and don’t feel like flying into an apoplectic rage:
Since I am asking you to accept my solemn word that the man in the Skype screen grab is in truth Jim Stone, I suppose it is time that I tell my story and establish my bona fides. I’m going to start with May of 2011, when Jim released his Fukushima Report. I can’t remember how I found it. As I was in a very dark and miserable stage of my “waking up” journey at that time, it might well have been Jeff Rense’s Labyrinth-of-Doom of a website. Rense linked to the Fukushima Report — exactly once — then removed the link and never mentioned Jim again. This bothered me at the time. I was studying the report very seriously, looking for errors, inconsistencies, weaknesses, signs of disinfo. I could find none. Jim backed his claims with aerial drone shots leaked by a site called Pink Tentacle. The footnotes were extensive and exhaustive. So in passing here I will flatly answer MacGregor’s implied question as to where Jim got his information: it’s called RESEARCH.
And to Adachi, who whines like a spoiled schoolchild that he first broke the Fukushima sabotage story and that Jim later tried to take all the credit, I make the same retort. Adachi based his claims on the testimony of his psychic friend Livingstone. There was absolutely nothing of any substance in Adachi’s article, nothing a serious seeker of truth could sink his or her teeth into. You could not show Adachi’s article to a sleeper and hope to wake them up with it. The Fukushima Report represents hundreds of hours of data collection and analysis. It includes so much hard evidence, that by even attempting to place his measly little article in the same league with it, Adachi (who would have you believe that there are chemtrail-gobbling fairies in the sky called “sylphs”) exposes himself for the egotistical dilettante that he is.
I will also note that if you look up Adachi’s teeny weeny Fukushima report, you will not find the original. The original had nothing in it but Adachi’s claims and quotes from Livingstone. Even if you try to find the damned original in the Wayback Machine, you can’t. So it would seem that Ken Adachi has some very resonant strings at his fingertips. Moving on.
As I studied Jim’s report, and as the weeks went by, I began to look suspiciously on “alternative” and “truth” websites that seemed to be studiously ignoring it. Jim had prominently posted on his front page a note stating that he answered any and all serious emails he received, and that if you received no answer, it meant he hadn’t gotten your mail. I wrote to Jim again and again and again, to no avail. Wondering if my IP had been flagged by whomever was censoring his mail, I went to internet cafes and set up bogus mailbox accounts. Nothing worked. I was miserable. I now felt that Rense and many other alternative news outlets were compromised and betraying the truth. As autumn sank into winter, I finally gave up. I was disconsolate. I felt that the internet was rigged and most of the “alternative” sites were just varying degrees of controlled opposition.
One day in early January 2012, on a whim, I gave Jim’s email address to an engineer friend and asked him to fire off a note. Jim answered, so I immediately wrote him again, referencing my engineer friend, and this time he wrote me back. His tone was friendly, brisk, and hectic. After posting the Fuku report, he had been unlawfully detained and had his vending machine business smashed up. Agents in the judicial system were trying to incarcerate him under an erroneous name. The government refused to issue him a passport. He was trying to figure out a way to escape, and the noose was tightening. Shaking off my despair and inertia, I started contacting the editors of alt news websites to see if any of them would post a writeup on Jim and the Fuku report.
The only one who answered in the affirmative was Henry Makow. He gave me a limit of 1000 words and told me two others before me had tried and failed. Henry liked my summary of the report. When he informed Jeff Rense that he was going to post it, and asked Rense to link to it, Rense flew into a rage. He ordered Henry not to post my article on his own website, or he would never link to Henry again. Henry posted it anyway. A very ugly battle between the two of them ensued. Henry then posted my followup article looking more closely at Stuxnet’s role in the attack, and a third article wherein I rebutted trolls who were claiming that Jim was a spook and not to be trusted, or that he was a fiction, or that he was me. Here are the links to those three articles, in chronological order:
Invigorated by my success, I stepped up my efforts to spread knowledge of the Fuku report. I was astonished at the level of resistance. Gmail locked me out of three mailboxes. My laptop was frequently hacked. I was harassed (“zapped”) via brainwaves piggybacked onto the carrier signal of my cell phone. It became at times frighteningly clear to me how serious the situation was. Powerful interests absolutely hated that report, hated Jim, and they let me know in no uncertain terms that the hatred now extended to me as well. The intimidation and harassment I experienced going to bat for Jim forever confirmed in my mind the validity of the information. While that fat-ass Alex Jones mouthed off from his slick studio down in Austin, running his limited hangout operation while perfectly free to travel around the country and consort with celebrities, this one man whom I’d befriended, and exchanged countless emails on all subjects with, was sleeping in a tent, eating from pizza restaurant dumpsters, charging his laptop at wifi cafes, intermittently having to “go dark” when they were closing in on him. When he was afraid, the fear was palpable in his words. The stories from his life were genuine. If you want a glimpse into the man’s soul, read the following essay and see what you think:
Speaking of which, I will now address the following “charge”, if you can really call it that, which people like Mr. MacGregor press against Jim: that his investigative journalism grew out of what was once a photography site. And my answer to that is a big, fat SO WHAT. Jim started out as an NSA analyst believing he was a patriot using his talents to serve his country. After leaving the NSA, he worked in a variety of different fields. At one point he was a pianist, and his album, The Minstrel, can be bought on Ebay. As his interest turned to investigative reporting, he set up a vending machine route and a photography website so that he could make a decent living while having more time to research and write. Eventually he gave up on the photography site and re-allocated it to his reports.
Again, speaking of which, his backlog is a lot more extensive that his detractors let on. When they deride and belittle his “Tainted Nightmare” report which exposed deliberate poisoning of vaccines, it betrays their intentions. There is also his earlier photo expose of the Israeli atrocity at Jenin, a report that considerably predated the current website.
Yet again, speaking of which, go to the website itself (which Google refuses to serve ads) and check out the wealth of links now posted at the top of the main page. Jim Stone has given us a lot of information, and much of it predates the Fukushima Report. The man did not just jump out of a black hole, to be, in MacGregor’s words, “introduced … to the world” in June of 2011 by Natural News.
Eventually, in April 2012, Jim managed to cross the border into Mexico with a passport issued by the World Service Authority. In an attempt to get him some money, I set up a Citibank account here in Seoul, the idea being that maybe I could place funds in it, and Jim could withdraw them in Mexico. I placed a small amount of money in it for testing purposes. Within a few days, Citibank notified me that they had closed my account. They offered no explanation, and when I pressed them for one they refused it. They also stole my fucking money. Tell me, Mr. MacGregor, was Jim Stone pulling levers in the vaulted interior of that bank, cackling with glee as he ingeniously separated me from my five dollars? Or is it more likely that Jim’s enemies are in positions of such power and influence that their monitoring agents informed them of my plan, then pulled strings at Citibank to kibosh it, no questions asked? I leave it for you to decide.
Furthermore, this man whom Mr. MacGregor calls a “conman” has never taken more in donations than he needed to survive on a very low budget in a poor country for a couple of months. I once had a lengthy Skype chat with him where he strolled his laptop through a Mexican Wal Mart and showed me how good the prices were for staples of sustenance. Once, when he was dangerously low on money, I offered to sell what little silver I have and send the cash to him. He flat-out refused to take it, insisting on the importance of having metals in case of monetary collapse, and that he would sleep in the street before taking my silver. It almost came to that. Some “conman”, eh?
I could go on and on. I’ve told my story this far just to give the reader something of myself to latch onto — the sense that there is a real guy behind the nom de guerre, who is disgusted with the state of the world, who cries when children are slaughtered and who bleeds when cut, who grew up fishing and hunting in Colorado, then in Oklahoma, where he was a varsity high school wrestler, then into the student loan mill where he earned a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and English Literature with a minor in Ancient Greek, followed by an M.A. in English Composition, a guy who got out of graduate school and realized he’d spent all that time and money unpreparing himself for life in The Machine, and who finally realized that he was congenitally incapable of making peace with it.
A guy who lived through 9/11 in NYC and less than two years later migrated to Asia vowing never to fund another missile strike.
I chose the name James Farganne (pronounced “far gone”) because there is music I’ve composed and recorded and released out there on the internet to which my real name will forever be tied. When I decided to put down the guitar and take up the (s)word, I didn’t want the music associated with my new endeavors. I wanted a clean break, a fresh start. The name came to me one day in a reverie.
At the end of the day, in this cyber-medium through which we choose to interact, we must all keep our B.S. detectors finely calibrated and make judgement calls as to whom we accept to be honest and real. I hope this article has lent weight to my testimony that the man in the screen grab is indeed Jim Stone, that I am his accomplice on a different continent, and that Mr. MacGregor is quite mistaken when he makes the claim that Stone is another manifestation of Joe Vialls.
On top of this, if you are still in doubt, review the work I have posted at this blog, and then do the same at Jim’s site. It will quickly become apparent to you (in case the slanderers have put certain ideas in your head) that Jim and I are two real and very different men with different talents and different styles.
Now I will turn my weary attention to Mr. MacGregor’s comments on the Fuku report itself:
“Jim Stone moved the centre of the earthquake and resultant tsunami, then reduced its actual size, and then brought in evidence that the Fukushima nuclear power plant had also been struck by the ‘Stuxnet Virus’, the same computer virus that had struck the Iranian nuclear power plants in the previous year. Nobody ever asked Jim where and how he actually obtained this information.”
Jim did not “move the centre” of the earthquake. Again engaging in that activity called RESEARCH, he found the Japanese seismograms, which proved the USGS ones fraudulent. The Japanese seismograms showed that there was no mag 9 quake out in the ocean. Instead, there were five simultaneous inland quakes of far lesser magnitude.
As for the tsunami, Jim did not “reduce its actual size”. He found out that the flooding did not subsume the transformers — maybe that’s what you’re talking about, otherwise I haven’t a clue.
The Fukushima Report’s footnotes made Jim’s sources abundantly clear.
“The really interesting part of Jim Stone’s explanation of the actual damage to the Fukushima Nuclear plant is that it was damaged by ‘nuclear bombs’ placed in the reactor rooms by an ‘Israeli’ inspection team. Well there goes the need for the ‘Stuxnet Virus’.”
This statement proves you didn’t study the report. Stuxnet alone was sufficient to take out Reactors 1 and 2, but Reactors 3 and 4 had been so extensively overbuilt that the virus alone would not have been sufficient to wreck them.
REACTOR 4 WAS FUKUSHIMA’S BUILDING 7. It was shut down that day, with its fuel removed.
On top of this, you’re dismissing a wealth of hard facts incriminating Mossad — too many to enumerate here. But if I had to choose one, how about this one, Mr. MacGregor? Can you explain how Israel was able to remotely monitor the containments in the wake of the attack via an illegal internet data link? How could such a link have been in place unless Magna BSP, the Dimona-based Israeli firm running security at Daiichi, put it there?
As far as I can tell, Mr. MacGregor, you have not read the Fukushima Report, and your argument that Jim Stone is in fact Joe Vialls is predicated only on your observation that Jim referenced Vialls’ articles. Is that all you’ve got? Really?
You’re a retired Australian police officer. Could the following article have done anything to provoke your baseless libel of my friend?
I’m just really grasping for some kind of motive, that’s all.
When you libel someone and denigrate their work, Mr. MacGregor, you had best be able to back it up. You gave no evidence for your allegations. I have given strong evidence against them. I have knocked the ball so hard that I doubt it is even in your court.
To download the latest (printable) edition of the Fukushima Report:
NO TE: If you try to share the following link via email, or mention Stone’s name in the body of your email, it is likely to get “lost”. The best way to spread this info is to download and share this .gif …
Those of you who are new to this site probably do not realize exactly how censored your news is. I suggest you read the following to find out. Yes, they absolutely WILL try to hide a nuclear blast, provided Israel did it and the target was Arabs.
The real issue at hand now is that Israel has proven itself out in the open, under documented irrefutable conditions, that it considers nuclear aggression acceptable policy. This means that for as long as Israel exists it is a menace to the world. It is fairly well proven that Israel caused the Indonesian tsunami, nuked Bali, caused the Japan tsunami, nuked Fukushima, and FINALLY, because an Arab set a decent camera up at exactly the right place and time, and had the balls to post the video immediately, it is proven and not a guess that Israel is a nuclear rogue.
I did not get the best screen grab for what I showed in my initial analysis, and when I was doing further work on this report, I landed on the holy grail – the moment of criticality. I did not know the camera captured this.
I cannot begin to emphasize enough how impossible it is to clip a camera sensor to maximum, even in the shadow areas. This means that even the windows in the buildings took in so much light that the normally dark area inside the buildings which would make the windows appear dark got so much light that even the super dark areas clipped the sensor. The sun will not do that, even with a massive over exposure. The only thing that will do that is a nuke, which is well known to be brighter than the sun.
This is the proverbial “no damage from a 9.0 earthquake, other than tsunami damage” proof that is needed to show this was a nuke. Anyone should be able to understand this, and you don´t need to know photoshop, you don´t need to know focal lengths and lens behavior, just look at the frame grabs below. They say it all and you do not need to be an expert to see it.
The following captures give you a clear reference for what is happening in the frames above. Put your finger on one of the flames in the frame above to see where it is in the picture while the light of the nuke is still overwhelming the camera so badly it cannot see that flame. How bright is the sun? Would that camera be able to see a fire at high noon? Obviously yes, and this proves that even after significantly fading, the nuke is STILL brighter than the sun.
There is only ONE THING WE KNOW OF, THAT CAN LIGHT THINGS BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN. THIS ALONE IS PROOF ISRAEL NUKED SYRIA
We now know what a nuclear attack looks like for real, and it is surprisingly Hollywood. We also know now that EMP is B.S., and that an ordinary camera can survive filming it. As I have always said, nuclear EMP is a HOAX that is going to be used as an excuse to get rid of technology via Intel CoreVpro processors, other 3g enabled processors, and via the 3g connections ALL AUTOMOTIVE CONTROL COMPUTERS AFTER 2004 HAVE ON ALL THE TIME, as well as smart meters which can probably command appliances to auto destruct, which will be used to fake the public into believing a nuclear EMP wiped everything out when in fact it was only the zionists using decades old 3g technology to tell everything to self destruct with a system we all forgot about. And THAT is how they will throw us back to the stone age, and accomplish our final enslavement.
This video is proof positive that our electronics are NOT susceptible to nuclear EMP, a fact I have been harping for a long time now, and all it took for me to know was to put pen to paper and calculate it out.
EMP fear mongering is a mind game, to get people to waste their efforts on that which is irrelevant. EMP from a nuke is a threat to ONE thing – a device hooked up to a wire over a mile long that has no protection circuit. Nuclear EMP needs a conductor with a cross section a mile long to couple with, it´s all very easy math. Your car, your laptop, your cell phone is immune, simply because it is too small to take in the signal. Power distribution systems, phone systems, ethernet computer networks with no fiber optics, and cable TV systems can be damaged but even then it is not likely, the nuclear tests of the 40´s 50´s and 60´s took place amidst power lines and phone networks, and the ONE time anything did get blown out it was a rotary multiplexer at a small local phone provider. Our modern stuff is far more robust simply because over time it was improved to survive lightning strikes.
But nuclear EMP is not the issue here, IS IT?
I´d say NO. The real issue at hand now is that Israel has proven itself out in the open, in documented irrefutable conditions, that it considers nuclear aggression an acceptable policy. This means that for as long as Israel exists, it is a menace to the world. It is fairly well proven that Israel caused the Indonesian tsunami, nuked Bali, caused the Japan tsunami, nuked Fukushima, and now, simply because an Arab set a decent camera up and had the balls to post the video immediately, it is PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT AND NOT A GUESSING GAME THAT ISRAEL IS A NUCLEAR ROGUE. I gotta laugh – it was their “eternally illiterate mud hut goat herder” patsy that nailed them. Hey Israel, WHO ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE TRUSTING WITH A BOMB?? Looks like the movie Airplane and many others were nothing but kike fantasies. The damage you caused to the reputation of others while being even WORSE filth yourselves is the pinnacle of all hypocrisy.
Even more damning is the blackout in the media – all forms of it. I can excuse some of the alternative media that has limited staffing for missing this, but CNN, FOX, AlJazeera, ABC, NBC, CBS, ALL latino news outlets, EVERYTHING “mainstream” has staffing good enough to know what went on, and their silence is absolutely DAMNING. It proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are all wrapped up in a blanket of zionist lies, disinfo, and SILENCE.
Two years on, and no one has managed to find a collapsed or leaning building outside the tsunami zone in Sendai, the city hardest hit by a 9.0.
All we have is TSUNAMI DAMAGE. SHOW ME THE EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE. ZERO COLLAPSED AND ZERO LEANING BUILDINGS OUTSIDE THE TSUNAMI ZONE EQUALS NO 9.0, 8.0, OR EVEN A 7.0.
Included in this additional report, posted March 13 2013, I have the OFFICIAL USGS charts that show Sendai, according to the USGS, had peak ground accelerations in excess of 3.7 G´s.
Folks, 0.35 g´s is considered adequate to possibly collapse a skyscraper when it is rated to survive an 8.0, yet the USGS said that INLAND, NORTH OF SENDAI the ground thrust was 12.7 g´s. Sendai proper had, according to the USGS, a MINIMUM G-force exerted on it of 3.7 across every square foot of the city, which is flatulent B.S, and fortunately the Japanese seismic readings farther down this page confirm that nothing on the Japanese mainland ANYWHERE should have fallen, provided it could withstand a 6.7 richter reading, and the REAL maximum ground acceleration ANYWHERE on Japan was in fact below 0.15 g’s. Where did the USGS get 12.7 from? The original charts from both the scamming USGS and the “please help spread the truth” Japanese seismologists are here, right now, on the front page. Compare them, look at the photos of perfectly un damaged Japanese towns and cities as the tsunami arrives, and decide for yourself – WHO IS LYING, THE JAPANESE, OR THE USGS?
After Sandy Hook, do you think ANY mainstream news outlet would tell the truth about this – Japan’s 911? The original Fukushima report laid the scam perpetrated by the USGS bare – the USGS has been usurped by an enemy and is now being used to front phony geological data for political purposes.
The scam of a 9.0 is so transparent that even the smallest kitten scratch on the surface of the topic lays waste to the official story; it takes a real stroke of sheeple style blindness to overlook the fact that it was ALL TSUNAMI DAMAGE because the earthquake never happened as stated at all. And if there was no significant quake, WHERE ON EARTH DID THAT TSUNAMI COME FROM?
THIS is the official USGS quake report, which shows the five top ground accelerations measured, the USGS clearly claims that a peak ground acceleration of 12.7 g’s happened at station MYG004, which is 70 KM inland, yet puts the epicenter out in the ocean, where there are no stations to record it. The station closest to the reported epicenter, which the USGS painstakingly omits, shows that on the Japanese coast nearest the purported “epicenter”, the quake registered a 5.63 on the richter scale which corresponds to a total ground thrust acceleration of approximately 0.08 G’s. Look at this USGS report carefully, which puts the ground acceleration at station MYG004 at over 12 g’s.To put this all in perspective, a quake that produces even 1 g of ground acceleration is considered to be one that virtually NO skyscraper, highway over pass or bridge can survive. Why then did a 12 G monster do virtually nothing at all where it was measured INLAND, FAR AWAY FROM THE OCEAN?
The picture below is NOT the USGS report, CLICK THE LINK ABOVE or Here, the USGS report is a PDF.
Take a look at the REAL richter readings in the photo below, which were provided by the various seismic monitoring agencies in Japan, which prove beyond all doubt the USGS lied.
Furthermore, I got numerous shill backstabs claiming that no damage happened inland because the ocean absorbed the quake. If the ocean really could absorb a quake (it cannot) it would be irrelevant if the USGS charts were true, charts which show peak ground accelerations of 12 G’s, 3.18 g’s, and 2.7 g’s, ALL TOTALLY APOCALYPTIC READINGS, happening hundreds of miles apart ON THE JAPANESE MAINLAND. The lack of damage outside the tsunami zone proves beyond all doubt that the USGS lied with their charts, and is therefore complicit in the lie that gave creedence to the Fukushima disaster.
Want gun confiscation to work? Want a reason to go door to door and expel EVERYONE from their homes? Want final tyranny lock down? How about blowing up a few nuclear facilities, as I was talking about shortly after Fukushima, and using THAT as an excuse to send Fema door to door? Blown up nuclear reactor trumps hurricane any day. That is why I published that cartoon, which was a lot of work to create. And with EXPLOSIVES ALREADY PLANTED IN A SWEDISH NUCLEAR FACILITY and a probable countless number of nuclear weapons spread across the world via one nation’s nuclear deterrent method, allowing them to nail any government via nuclear blackmail I have no doubt that the “elite” would have no compunctions about blowing up a few nuclear reactors in the U.S. to convince the American public to go along with their disaster plan, which would no doubt include total relocation of the population, and confiscations of all firearms.
They may be able to sway governments with planted nukes, but with regard to gun confiscation in America they are going to have to find a way to sway the people and a nuclear disaster may be the ticket.
Things are starting to heat up now, and THAT is why I published that cartoon. Spreading it could very well change the future. Do not let it sit here on this web site, GET IT OFF THIS SITE, RENAME IT, AND POST IT ELSEWHERE.
Use the larger version for resizing, 800 pixels is as small as you can go and have the print on the gauges be readable.
Only ignorance of the population will let them get away with what I believe is now a short term plan.
This brilliant article shows you the kind of threat we are really up against. When I was in the NSA, this was a major topic, and a man would go around the facility with a spectrum analyzer, tuning the entire radio spectrum across a display screen looking for “leaks” in the system which could be exploited exactly the way this article talks about. These scans took place every few feet, and it took days to go around the facility making sure there were no leaks. This is a reality, and there is no doubt the world’s nuclear facilities have indeed been scanned the same way via satellite, looking for leaks in their hard wired totally off the web secure LAN and PLC systems they operate with, and MANY have been penetrated and had crap put on them straight out of what would appear to be “the ether.” I am NOT joking about the Stuxnet threat, it is EXACTLY like that cartoon.
This was MORE than a major topic at the NSA, it was a way of life. There is NO SUCH THING AS “SECURE” when it comes to dealing with what I have now come to name as “that group of invasive bastards”.
The only error in that report is that they are calling it a “new era”. That crap was happening DECADES ago.
This cartoon got attention and has resulted in my being cut off from everyone via e-mail, and apparently Skype, Cell phone, and pay phones. This can be accomplished easily by simply knowing who the people I would normally call are, and killing all calls to those people from this region. Pay phones used to work, but now they just eat the money and ditch all calls, of which I have attempted at least 80 to various people, with zero connects to anything other than voice mail which can be easily arranged and is totally useless, and at that, at times people said they would be available or are normally available. Skype and direct cell call attempts appear to be useless as well.
Why such severe isolation for nailing this topic at this particular time?
As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got shut off.
by James Farganne
Recently, I posted a short overviewof Jim Stone’s Fukushima report, which concluded that the 9.0-magnitude quake was a lie concocted to conceal the real cause of the tsunami: a seabed nuke.
Stone’s report proves definitively that the official story of 3/11, like that of 9/11, is a poorly woven fabric of lies and inconsistencies.
Drone photos show that the containment walls of Reactors 1, 3, and 4 were obliterated. Concrete walls 4 – 8 feet thick were blown to dust, leaving only skeletal rebar. Hydrogen, at such low pressure, could never have wrought such massive destruction. It would defy laws of physics, as well as historical precedent.
The destruction of Reactor 4’s containment walls was a clear case of sabotage. It had no fuel in it, so it was not operating. Yet it blew sky high. Reactor 3 vanished completely, core and all, after exploding into a mushroom cloud.
Claims by Arnie Gundersen that the explosions resulted from “prompt criticality” don’t wash. Reactor core meltdowns do not produce mushroom clouds. Nuclear weapons do that. Moreover, Gundersen, “expert” mouthpiece for the MSM and alternative media outlets, has been outed by real professionals in his field as a fraud.
The foregoing facts are clear enough to the untrained eye. More subtle are signs of sabotage within the power plants’ control systems. Seeing these takes more brainpower. You need to visualize the unfamiliar. You have to find out what switch gear is. There’s a dry official report to hump through, diagrams at which to squint. You have to scroll toward the bottom of Stone’s report for this section. It has no proper title. Just keep your eyes peeled for the first sentence:
“Fukushima was impossible.”
This section was the kernel of Stone’s investigation. It is a crystalline lattice of logic and evidence that obliterates the official story of the reactors’ destruction as completely as the reactors were themselves destroyed.
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
According to officialdom, the reactors exploded because the cores overheated. The emergency cooling systems failed because the backup generators were flooded by the tsunami.
All of this is bogus. First, a careful reading of an official report from the World Nuclear Association reveals that the tsunami did not flood the generators. There was another cause for their malfunction.
Second, three of the nine cooling systems needed no electricity. They used steam power from the reactor cores. They were the real emergency systems. Swamped generators would therefore have been irrelevant.
Third, these three passive systems kicked in at Reactors 1 and 3. Then the valves that fed them steam were shut. This required a command. It was a deliberate act.
Israeli security firm Magna BSP landed a security contract at Fukushima Daiichi shortly after Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon after Magna BSP arrived, cybersecurity giant Symantec reported that the Stuxnet virus had infiltrated thousands of computers in Japan.
This is significant because Stuxnet is an Israeli invention. Magna BSP, an Israeli firm, had no previous history outside of contracts with Dimona, where the Stuxnet virus was born.
Stuxnet works by disrupting industrial hydraulics, the pipes and valves that drove Fukushima’s cooling systems. Stuxnet runs amok while sending normal readings to the engineers at their control stations. Israel is documented to have used this virus to damage centrifuges at a nuclear facility in Iran.
The cooling systems at Fukushima were controlled by Siemens software, which the Stuxnet virus was designed specifically to attack.
Stuxnet can be administrated via the kind of data link that Magna BSP installed before scramming back to Israel just prior to the disaster.
As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got shut. It explains why engineers are still getting containment pressure readings from Reactor 3, even though the containment is no longer there, and it explains a lot of other things as well.
If you want to debunk the Stuxnet hypothesis, you’re going to have your work cut out for you. If Stuxnet was a duck, then everything about what happened at Fukushima would be quacking like one.
On 3/11/11, Reactors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were utterly destroyed, with 1, 3, and 4 suspiciously exploding.
Though Stone only got direct evidence of a nuke planted at Reactor 3, which produced the mushroom cloud, it is rational to believe Reactors 1 and 4 also had them, with 4 exploding even though it had no fuel core installed at the time.
The lesser magnitude of the explosions at Reactors 1 and 4 can be attributed to the fact that gun-type nukes are not consistent in their yield. Reactor 3’s detonation might also have gotten a boost from the pressure released in a reactor pressure vessel breach — a sensible conclusion in that the reactor is completely gone. Stuxnet appears to have affected all of the reactors’ control systems, crippling generators and shutting valves. Problems at Reactor 2 appear to be Stuxnet-related only. All four were fatalities.
But of course, don’t take my word for it. Go and study the report for yourself.