Category Archives: police corruption

James Is Not Jim Is Not Joe

james-n-jim

Last night, staying in a pension on Korea’s southwest coast, I was about to hit the hay when a Facebook friend sent me the following link:

http://therebel.org/news/andrew-macgregor/joe-vialls-ari-and-jim-stone-in-the-mouse-that-roared/

I clicked. I waited. The article wouldn’t load. I stepped outside for some fresh air. When I came back, the server had timed out. I clicked again and again. Again and again, the same result. I told my friend it would have to wait for morning and went to bed.

I am very glad that The Rebel’s server didn’t let me see this article, because it would have ruined my sleep. In it, the author, Andrew MacGregor, accuses my friend Jim Stone of being a murderer. Along the way to this libelous conclusion, he misrepresents and distorts Jim’s work. It is so ridiculous that I do not want to devote the time and effort necessary to answer it; but answer it I must. The only question now is, where to begin.

I guess I’ll start with the most nonsensical of Mr. MacGregor’s claims: that American investigative journalist Jim Stone is actually Australian investigative journalist Joe Vialls, who was actually Israeli Mossad agent Ari Ben Menashe.

First, I direct your attention to the following article, in which the writer testifies that Joe Vialls was a devoted family man and denies that he doubled as anyone else:

http://www.henrymakow.com/joe_vialls_right_was_accused.html

From the above article, here is a color picture of Joe Vialls:

Joe Vialls
Joe Vialls

Here, by contrast, is a color image of Jim Stone:

Jim Stone
Jim Stone

The latter is a screen grab from a Skype interview that Jim did with Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot in April 2012.

So, you may ask, how are you to believe that the fellow in the interview was really Jim Stone? Well, if you really don’t want to accept the easiest and most obvious conclusion — that the voice and speech mannerisms exactly match every other interview he ever gave, and he is in full command of the research and information released under that name, so it must be him — then maybe you’ll take my word for it.

You see, I know that’s Jim Stone because I spent dozens of hours talking with him on Skype after he made his escape to Mexico.

“Well,” you might then say, “but what about you, Mr. James Farganne? I googled you, and Ken Adachi says that isn’t your real name, and that you and Stone are a tag-team psy op duo and blah blah yadda yadda ya …”

Since his idiotic libel recently caused me some hardship in establishing a new connection with a fellow activist, I am going to take Ken Adachi to task in this article as well. Here is Adachi’s drivel, which I will not re-read because I just got back from my nice little trip to the coast and don’t feel like flying into an apoplectic rage:

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/jimstonejamesfarganne19sep12.shtml

Since I am asking you to accept my solemn word that the man in the Skype screen grab is in truth Jim Stone, I suppose it is time that I tell my story and establish my bona fides. I’m going to start with May of 2011, when Jim released his Fukushima Report. I can’t remember how I found it. As I was in a very dark and miserable stage of my “waking up” journey at that time, it might well have been Jeff Rense’s Labyrinth-of-Doom of a website. Rense linked to the Fukushima Report — exactly once — then removed the link and never mentioned Jim again. This bothered me at the time. I was studying the report very seriously, looking for errors, inconsistencies, weaknesses, signs of disinfo. I could find none. Jim backed his claims with aerial drone shots leaked by a site called Pink Tentacle. The footnotes were extensive and exhaustive. So in passing here I will flatly answer MacGregor’s implied question as to where Jim got his information: it’s called RESEARCH.

And to Adachi, who whines like a spoiled schoolchild that he first broke the Fukushima sabotage story and that Jim later tried to take all the credit, I make the same retort. Adachi based his claims on the testimony of his psychic friend Livingstone. There was absolutely nothing of any substance in Adachi’s article, nothing a serious seeker of truth could sink his or her teeth into. You could not show Adachi’s article to a sleeper and hope to wake them up with it. The Fukushima Report represents hundreds of hours of data collection and analysis. It includes so much hard evidence, that by even attempting to place his measly little article in the same league with it, Adachi (who would have you believe that there are chemtrail-gobbling fairies in the sky called “sylphs”) exposes himself for the egotistical dilettante that he is.

I will also note that if you look up Adachi’s teeny weeny Fukushima report, you will not find the original. The original had nothing in it but Adachi’s claims and quotes from Livingstone. Even if you try to find the damned original in the Wayback Machine, you can’t. So it would seem that Ken Adachi has some very resonant strings at his fingertips. Moving on.

As I studied Jim’s report, and as the weeks went by, I began to look suspiciously on “alternative” and “truth” websites that seemed to be studiously ignoring it. Jim had prominently posted on his front page a note stating that he answered any and all serious emails he received, and that if you received no answer, it meant he hadn’t gotten your mail. I wrote to Jim again and again and again, to no avail. Wondering if my IP had been flagged by whomever was censoring his mail, I went to internet cafes and set up bogus mailbox accounts. Nothing worked. I was miserable. I now felt that Rense and many other alternative news outlets were compromised and betraying the truth. As autumn sank into winter, I finally gave up. I was disconsolate. I felt that the internet was rigged and most of the “alternative” sites were just varying degrees of controlled opposition.

One day in early January 2012, on a whim, I gave Jim’s email address to an engineer friend and asked him to fire off a note. Jim answered, so I immediately wrote him again, referencing my engineer friend, and this time he wrote me back. His tone was friendly, brisk, and hectic. After posting the Fuku report, he had been unlawfully detained and had his vending machine business smashed up. Agents in the judicial system were trying to incarcerate him under an erroneous name. The government refused to issue him a passport. He was trying to figure out a way to escape, and the noose was tightening. Shaking off my despair and inertia, I started contacting the editors of alt news websites to see if any of them would post a writeup on Jim and the Fuku report.

The only one who answered in the affirmative was Henry Makow. He gave me a limit of 1000 words and told me two others before me had tried and failed. Henry liked my summary of the report. When he informed Jeff Rense that he was going to post it, and asked Rense to link to it, Rense flew into a rage. He ordered Henry not to post my article on his own website, or he would never link to Henry again. Henry posted it anyway. A very ugly battle between the two of them ensued. Henry then posted my followup article looking more closely at Stuxnet’s role in the attack, and a third article wherein I rebutted trolls who were claiming that Jim was a spook and not to be trusted, or that he was a fiction, or that he was me. Here are the links to those three articles, in chronological order:

http://henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
http://henrymakow.com/fukushima_-_what_really_happen.html
http://henrymakow.com/jim_stone_is_the_real_thing.html

Invigorated by my success, I stepped up my efforts to spread knowledge of the Fuku report. I was astonished at the level of resistance. Gmail locked me out of three mailboxes. My laptop was frequently hacked. I was harassed (“zapped”) via brainwaves piggybacked onto the carrier signal of my cell phone. It became at times frighteningly clear to me how serious the situation was. Powerful interests absolutely hated that report, hated Jim, and they let me know in no uncertain terms that the hatred now extended to me as well. The intimidation and harassment I experienced going to bat for Jim forever confirmed in my mind the validity of the information. While that fat-ass Alex Jones mouthed off from his slick studio down in Austin, running his limited hangout operation while perfectly free to travel around the country and consort with celebrities, this one man whom I’d befriended, and exchanged countless emails on all subjects with, was sleeping in a tent, eating from pizza restaurant dumpsters, charging his laptop at wifi cafes, intermittently having to “go dark” when they were closing in on him. When he was afraid, the fear was palpable in his words. The stories from his life were genuine. If you want a glimpse into the man’s soul, read the following essay and see what you think:

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/civilization.html

Speaking of which, I will now address the following “charge”, if you can really call it that, which people like Mr. MacGregor press against Jim: that his investigative journalism grew out of what was once a photography site. And my answer to that is a big, fat SO WHAT. Jim started out as an NSA analyst believing he was a patriot using his talents to serve his country. After leaving the NSA, he worked in a variety of different fields. At one point he was a pianist, and his album, The Minstrel, can be bought on Ebay. As his interest turned to investigative reporting, he set up a vending machine route and a photography website so that he could make a decent living while having more time to research and write. Eventually he gave up on the photography site and re-allocated it to his reports.

Again, speaking of which, his backlog is a lot more extensive that his detractors let on. When they deride and belittle his “Tainted Nightmare” report which exposed deliberate poisoning of vaccines, it betrays their intentions. There is also his earlier photo expose of the Israeli atrocity at Jenin, a report that considerably predated the current website.

Yet again, speaking of which, go to the website itself (which Google refuses to serve ads) and check out the wealth of links now posted at the top of the main page. Jim Stone has given us a lot of information, and much of it predates the Fukushima Report. The man did not just jump out of a black hole, to be, in MacGregor’s words, “introduced … to the world” in June of 2011 by Natural News.

Eventually, in April 2012, Jim managed to cross the border into Mexico with a passport issued by the World Service Authority. In an attempt to get him some money, I set up a Citibank account here in Seoul, the idea being that maybe I could place funds in it, and Jim could withdraw them in Mexico. I placed a small amount of money in it for testing purposes. Within a few days, Citibank notified me that they had closed my account. They offered no explanation, and when I pressed them for one they refused it. They also stole my fucking money. Tell me, Mr. MacGregor, was Jim Stone pulling levers in the vaulted interior of that bank, cackling with glee as he ingeniously separated me from my five dollars? Or is it more likely that Jim’s enemies are in positions of such power and influence that their monitoring agents informed them of my plan, then pulled strings at Citibank to kibosh it, no questions asked? I leave it for you to decide.

Furthermore, this man whom Mr. MacGregor calls a “conman” has never taken more in donations than he needed to survive on a very low budget in a poor country for a couple of months. I once had a lengthy Skype chat with him where he strolled his laptop through a Mexican Wal Mart and showed me how good the prices were for staples of sustenance. Once, when he was dangerously low on money, I offered to sell what little silver I have and send the cash to him. He flat-out refused to take it, insisting on the importance of having metals in case of monetary collapse, and that he would sleep in the street before taking my silver. It almost came to that. Some “conman”, eh?

I could go on and on. I’ve told my story this far just to give the reader something of myself to latch onto — the sense that there is a real guy behind the nom de guerre, who is disgusted with the state of the world, who cries when children are slaughtered and who bleeds when cut, who grew up fishing and hunting in Colorado, then in Oklahoma, where he was a varsity high school wrestler, then into the student loan mill where he earned a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and English Literature with a minor in Ancient Greek, followed by an M.A. in English Composition, a guy who got out of graduate school and realized he’d spent all that time and money unpreparing himself for life in The Machine, and who finally realized that he was congenitally incapable of making peace with it.

A guy who lived through 9/11 in NYC and less than two years later migrated to Asia vowing never to fund another missile strike.

I chose the name James Farganne (pronounced “far gone”) because there is music I’ve composed and recorded and released out there on the internet to which my real name will forever be tied. When I decided to put down the guitar and take up the (s)word, I didn’t want the music associated with my new endeavors. I wanted a clean break, a fresh start. The name came to me one day in a reverie.

At the end of the day, in this cyber-medium through which we choose to interact, we must all keep our B.S. detectors finely calibrated and make judgement calls as to whom we accept to be honest and real. I hope this article has lent weight to my testimony that the man in the screen grab is indeed Jim Stone, that I am his accomplice on a different continent, and that Mr. MacGregor is quite mistaken when he makes the claim that Stone is another manifestation of Joe Vialls.

On top of this, if you are still in doubt, review the work I have posted at this blog, and then do the same at Jim’s site. It will quickly become apparent to you (in case the slanderers have put certain ideas in your head) that Jim and I are two real and very different men with different talents and different styles.

Now I will turn my weary attention to Mr. MacGregor’s comments on the Fuku report itself:

“Jim Stone moved the centre of the earthquake and resultant tsunami, then reduced its actual size, and then brought in evidence that the Fukushima nuclear power plant had also been struck by the ‘Stuxnet Virus’, the same computer virus that had struck the Iranian nuclear power plants in the previous year. Nobody ever asked Jim where and how he actually obtained this information.”

Jim did not “move the centre” of the earthquake. Again engaging in that activity called RESEARCH, he found the Japanese seismograms, which proved the USGS ones fraudulent. The Japanese seismograms showed that there was no mag 9 quake out in the ocean. Instead, there were five simultaneous inland quakes of far lesser magnitude.

As for the tsunami, Jim did not “reduce its actual size”. He found out that the flooding did not subsume the transformers — maybe that’s what you’re talking about, otherwise I haven’t a clue.

The Fukushima Report’s footnotes made Jim’s sources abundantly clear.

“The really interesting part of Jim Stone’s explanation of the actual damage to the Fukushima Nuclear plant is that it was damaged by ‘nuclear bombs’ placed in the reactor rooms by an ‘Israeli’ inspection team. Well there goes the need for the ‘Stuxnet Virus’.”

This statement proves you didn’t study the report. Stuxnet alone was sufficient to take out Reactors 1 and 2, but Reactors 3 and 4 had been so extensively overbuilt that the virus alone would not have been sufficient to wreck them.

REACTOR 4 WAS FUKUSHIMA’S BUILDING 7. It was shut down that day, with its fuel removed.

On top of this, you’re dismissing a wealth of hard facts incriminating Mossad — too many to enumerate here. But if I had to choose one, how about this one, Mr. MacGregor? Can you explain how Israel was able to remotely monitor the containments in the wake of the attack via an illegal internet data link? How could such a link have been in place unless Magna BSP, the Dimona-based Israeli firm running security at Daiichi, put it there?

As far as I can tell, Mr. MacGregor, you have not read the Fukushima Report, and your argument that Jim Stone is in fact Joe Vialls is predicated only on your observation that Jim referenced Vialls’ articles. Is that all you’ve got? Really?

You’re a retired Australian police officer. Could the following article have done anything to provoke your baseless libel of my friend?

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/queensland.html

I’m just really grasping for some kind of motive, that’s all.

When you libel someone and denigrate their work, Mr. MacGregor, you had best be able to back it up. You gave no evidence for your allegations. I have given strong evidence against them. I have knocked the ball so hard that I doubt it is even in your court.

To download the latest (printable) edition of the Fukushima Report:

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

My Australian radio interview:

 

Advertisements

Kimberly Dvorak Spreads Ridiculous Claim About Hastings Engine

In more than one appearance on San Diego’s Channel 6 News, “investigative” journalist Kimberly Dvorak has stated that the engine from Michael Hastings’ Mercedes c250 landed behind the wreck — defying, in her own words, the laws of physics.

She even claims to have consulted university professors. Here she commences dispensing this rank nonsense at the 2:00 mark:


I am astonished that such statements can be received with straight faces. Yes, the crash did happen in Hollywood, but only in cinematic productions are the laws of physics defied.

I will now show you where the engine really landed.

Here is a screenshot from the Loudlabs footage, taken at the scene after the crash:

engine_loc_llabs

Note the streetlight pole to the left. Note also the manhole cover and the concrete slab it sits in, as well as the trees leaning over the sidewalk.

All of these are clearly visible in the following aerial shot from Google Maps —  click to enlarge:

Highland-Clinton

That is the northeast corner of the intersection of North Highland Avenue and Clinton Street.

Zooming out — again, click to enlarge:

Highland-Clinton2

The car was speeding south on Highland as indicated by the white arrow.

The yellow flash indicates an explosion that took place. This explosion demolished the front end of the car and threw the engine southeast.

That is the only way the engine could have reached its final position.

Had the car hit the tree fully intact, the engine could not have passed through the tree, much less flown down the block.

I think two bombs were involved: one that destroyed the front end and threw the engine, and one that blew the gas tank, which could account for the massive fire. My analysis leading to this conclusion takes into account and matches up the damage to the car and to the tree:

https://farganne.wordpress.com/2013/06/28/two-car-bombs-at-the-hastings-crash-the-evidence/

Long story short, the Mercedes was already a wreck when it hit the palm tree, rotated, and landed, burning, in its final position facing slightly southeast.

There were many long days when outside of eating, sleeping, and answering to Nature, my sole activity was studying the details of that crash scene and deducing a scenario that explains all its oddities.

I’m glad I wasn’t trying to swallow food when I saw Kimberly Dvorak on TV telling the world that the engine landed north of the wreck, behind it.

I sent a “friend request” to Kimberly on Facebook. She accepted it. I did not complain publicly on her timeline. I figured she had just gotten it backward somehow and decided to give her the benefit of the doubt. So I sent her private messages politely pointing out her error, providing a link where she could see for herself where the engine really landed, and asking that she correct it.

In Facebook, when you send a private message to someone, and they click in the message window, you are notified that the message has been seen.

Kimberly Dvorak saw my messages, and she never did respond.

Next thing I knew, I was watching a video of her up on RT news, spouting the same utter nonsense about university professors declaring that the laws of physics had been violated by the engine landing behind (north of) the wreck.

I have not yet seen Kimberly Dvorak retracting these ridiculous statements.

If she really did consult “university professors”, and they corroborated her nonsense, then they did not take the time to become familiar with the crash scene.

If she truly believes that the engine landed behind the wreck, then she should not be trusted as a source of information, especially when she ignores reliable sources of it.

Two Car Bombs at the Hastings Crash — The Evidence

Two Car Bombs at the Hastings Crash — The Evidence

[NOTE: If you read this article a few days ago, please consider re-reading, as it has been substantially updated, and now includes a mathematical analysis of the engine/tranny throw. Also, there is one detail that absolutely proves the car did not hit the tree intact. This detail is found in the update at the end of the main body of the article below.]

First, in case you are unfamiliar with the crash scene, a brief orientation.

The car crashed into a palm tree on the median adjacent to 621 North Highland Avenue (west side). It was traveling due south. An aerial shot from Google Maps:

aerial_crash_bearings(Click to enlarge)

The red arrow represents the car’s trajectory until it swerved eastward onto the median. The indicated palm tree is the one it struck. The red ‘A’ thumbtack is 621 North Highland.

The car struck the tree on its north-by-northwest side — that is, if you were to face the tree looking due south, the initial impact zone on the trunk would be slightly off-center to the right. That is where the bark is cleanly chewed away. In the following photo provided by Jim Stone forum member Doug, you can see that the impact damage extends around the west side of the trunk, dissipating as it goes:

trunk_nw

Note that to the extreme right of the trunk (southwest side) you can see the end of impact damage and after that there is only charred bark. This damage pattern indicates that the car struck the tree and rotated counterclockwise if seen from above. It ended up facing just south of due east. Yet there are no skid marks on the grass or asphalt from the back tires, indicating that they were airborne during the rotation.

Here is another shot provided by Doug showing scorched grass and asphalt but no skid marks on either. Doug took it from the west side of the avenue, in front of 621 N. Highland, facing east. The swath of scorched grass tells us the car’s orientation as it burned.

impactedtree_doug

So, it is established that the car struck the tree slightly to the west on its north side and rotated with rear wheels airborne to the position indicated by the scorched grass area.

How and why did that happen? I’ll call this The Rotation Question, and I will answer it below.

First, we need to look at the engine, which was thrown 130 feet to the southeast and landed near the northeast corner of Highland Ave. and Clinton Street. First, a view from the ground, grabbed from the Livelabs footage appended at the end of this article:

[Note: Some guys have jumped on me — “That not the engine, that the transmission, your a moron!” — okay, I’m not a car guy. Whatever. That thing is heavy and it flew a long way.]

engine_loc_llabs

You can see the streetlight (left of engine), the concrete area with manhole it sits on, and the two leaning trees (right of engine) both in the following aerial shot and from Maps street view:

engine_loc_maps(Click to enlarge)

The car hit the tree on its north-by-northwest side. The engine ended up 130 feet southeast of the tree. Even assuming that no bombs were involved, the obvious question is, how did the engine clear the tree? It could never have flown through it!

I’ll call this the Magic Engine Question. Again, I’ll answer it below.

[Update: After reading this report, my engineer friend Bruce got curious and did some calculations on the engine flight, proving that even if the tree weren’t in the way, the car would have had to be going 250 mph to throw the engine that far — and that doesn’t even factor in the bolts fastening the engine to the car. His presentation is here: Simple Physics Calculation]

Next, I direct your attention to the debris field extending from the wreck area in a southeasterly spray pattern toward the blown-out engine.

On the east side of the avenue, facing southwest, engine down the road, off-screen, to the left:

debrisfield_sw

Facing northwest, toward the wreck:

debrisfield_nw

The debris field is extensive and far-reaching. I cannot consider it consistent with a mere high-speed impact.

Had it just been a high-speed impact, the front end ought to have been “wrapped around” the trunk of the tree, as you’ll see below.

But all that debris came from somewhere, and here it is — a mostly missing front end:

frontendgone2

The sheet of metal to the left of the tree is the Mercedes’ hood, wrapped around its south side. Here’s a due-south grab from the median:

frontendgone3

Now think about this for a minute. Take a good, hard look, and THINK.

Is there some quality about palm trees that makes them incredibly destructive to the front end of an impacting vehicle?

For quick reference, here are some shots of high-speed front-end impacts. Click on them for the sources.

truck_tree
cartree2

car_crash_tree

The person who posted this next one claims the driver was an uncle going 200 kilometers per hour, or 125 mph:
large_crash

Click on this next one and you’ll see an assortment of similar photos, non of the wrecks burned, and none with detached hoods:

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Based on this evidence alone, I am convinced  there was a bomb in the engine compartment that destroyed the Mercedes’ front end and threw the engine. Since the cab was not destroyed, it was a directional bomb designed and placed to project the force of the explosion toward the front of the car.

Whiz kid Jim Stone forum member Glitch had this to say on the subject:

@Farganne Excluding the impossibility of the engine clearing the tree, the engine would not have gone 130 feet away from a collision alone. First, the engine would have to break free of its mounts, which are by no means weak. Then it would have to rip through the hood&frame in order to exit the engine compartment. After all of that, it would have to still have enough force from the momentum to travel 130 feet. Now, the engine in a Mercedes-Benz is not big, and weighs around 800-1200 lbs, and after ripping through the frame, it would not go very far. I don’t include math in this one as there are so many factors that are difficult to mathematically quantify, (the force to bust through the frame) and I don’t want to sit here all day doing it.

Moving on, here is a view of the wreck from the east side of Highland, facing due west:

crash_eastside

Note that the top of the cab is caved in. Again, there’s the hood, twisted around the left (south) side of the tree.

The right front wheel looks to have been blown forward and cocked at an angle almost perpendicular to the rest of the car. It didn’t appear that way before the 2:00 mark of the Loudlabs footage, but it did afterward. There were secondary explosions during the time the car sat burning, so this bit of damage may have resulted from one of those.

Either that, or the wheel we see in this shot is actually the left front wheel blown over and obscuring the right front wheel from this angle.

Next, we need to take a look at the fire.

hastingsfire

Many have been quick to point out that a Mercedes is not a Pinto. It doesn’t just burst into flames on impact with a tree. The gas tank in this vehicle is situated at its rear anyway. I think Jim Stone was correct in his assessment of the fire. It was instantly all-engulfing and incredibly intense. Such a fire could only have been initiated by a gas tank bomb, and I am taking that as a given.

I will close the focus on the fire by noting that Jose, the Spanish-speaking witness in the Loudlabs footage, though struggling to express himself in English, clearly indicated (3:45 – 3:48) that the car was on fire before it hit the tree. That tells me the gas tank bomb went off before the car hit the tree.

Now, after spending probably dozens of hours squinting at this scene from all angles, and visualizing scenerios to find one that explains all the observations I have made thus far, I am going to tell you what I think happened.

As it passed the two closely-spaced palm trees to the north of the impact palm, the car swerved left onto the median.

At that moment, both the gas tank bomb and an engine compartment bomb simultaneously went off.

Now for some Newtonian physics — equal and opposite reactions. The gas tank bomb caused the rear end of the car to lift. At the same time, the kick-back from the bomb in the engine compartment provided a counteracting “downward-and-backward” force.

The car flew toward the tree at reduced speed with its rear end raised and nose lowered.

Going in slow motion now. The blast threw the hood into the tree. It threw the engine down the street. At this point, there would still have been sufficient distance between car and tree for the bomb to throw the engine past the tree and down the street. This would be the point of origin of the debris field.

The hood hit the tree and wrapped around it.

At that point, before the hood fell, the car hit the tree with two impact points: first, whatever forward-projecting metallic scraps remained of the lower chassis (base of the trunk), followed by the upper edge of the windshield (higher up the tree).

The wrapped-around hood shielded the tree from surface abrasion at the upper impact point.

The Mercedes hit the tree slightly to the left of its own center. Forward momentum made it rotate counterclockwise (viewed from above) while falling to its final position, rear wheels airborne the whole time.

As it rotated, the wrapped hood went with it and ended up curved around the tree’s south side.

It fell in a heap where you see the scorched grass.

Loudlabs arrived, and I have had a headache ever since.

I believe that the car was remotely controlled.

And that is how I see it having happened.

Here is the Loudlabs footage:

Update:

Jim Stone forum member tigerwolfe made this valuable observation:

I believe I have identified a piece of the debris field from the limplobs video at around the 4:50 mark. While viewing the vid, I’d seen this peice many times, Like I’m certain many others have too. Could not ID it, so I ignored it.

It turns out to be from the nose of the Mercedes. The part of the front bumper to which the front license plate attaches. The front California license plate is NOT in the bracket, and could NOT get out without removing the white plastic trim.

This piece found on the road is NOT a piece from a car that hit a tree head-on at 100mph. And this piece did NOT come from a car that was currently licensed in CA.

A frame taken from the video:

And close-ups with a 2013 Diamond Silver Metallic Mercedes-Benz C 250 Coupe superimposed.

I will add this to tigerwolfe’s observation:

Q.E.D.

_____________

Addendum 1:

Was there a driver in the car?

I offer for your inspection these two shots. Is that a crash dummy head?

head_side

head_front

_____________

Addendum 2:

There has been some confusion about this shot. At first glance, it doesn’t seem to match the crash scene, but actually it does.

telescopic

The denser, more crowded appearance of palm trees is due to telephoto lens distortion. The sign with the arrow above the car is way down at the intersection with Clinton Street. The telephoto lens magnified it.

From this shot it is also obvious that they shifted the wreck and removed the driver’s door after they extinguished the fire. Why, I don’t know.

___________

Addendum 3:

In my humble opinion, anyone claiming the Mercedes was hit by a Hellfire missile is either deliberately or mistakenly full of it. For reasons that should be obvious by way of the preceding analysis.

Over and out.

Proof That A Car Bomb Killed Michael Hastings?

Disclaimer: When I first posted this, I was excited and maybe too sure of myself. I am not an expert in these matters. So I offer the following evidence to support my current thesis that a car bomb in the engine compartment destroyed the front end of the Mercedes and lobbed the engine down the street. I have been alerted to at least one precedent for engine ejection upon impact, so I wonder what a bomb could do.
________________

Note: Jim Stone has stated that the following image is from a photo op scene with a switched car at a switched location. I don’t know. Even if that is true, the footage showing the obliteration of the car’s front end was taken at the scene, when it was still dark.

When I first saw this tableau, I immediately wondered: WHY THE BLANKET?

0:59

Now I know. It’s because the front end of the car is almost completely GONE.

Check out these still shots, taken from Loudlabs News footage (posted below):

blownapart

The carriage and rear end are cocked back from a blast that cleared the engine compartment. The right front wheel and part of the front bumper are about all that’s left, and they are cocked forward.

Now from the driver’s side angle:

frontendgone2

Note what looks to be the hood twisted around the left side of the palm tree.

Now, a direct side shot:

frontendgone3

The blanket was there to hide the fact that almost the entire front end of the car is gone.

Only a bomb could have done that.

Perhaps this explains the flight of the engine down the street. I leave that to the more technically-minded to decide.

Jim Stone’s analysis: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/hastingsmurdered.html

Update:

A member at the Jim Stone Forum argues that such damage is consistent with a normal high-speed tree impact. That may very well be. But Stone’s analysis has already shown that this was no ordinary car fire.

That raging fire, in my opinion, would not happen from a bomb-free impact. Car experts agree.

Consider, too, the eyewitness testimony at 1:11 of the Loudlabs footage below, where she states that the car “exploded upon impact” with the tree.

Also the other eyewitness who told the local news reporter that her house shook and her windows rattled — that it sounded, and felt, like a bomb had exploded.

Then there’s the engine down the street.

Finally, I went to Google Images and looked up some high-speed vehicle-tree collisions. They are indeed incredibly destructive.

But look at that last photo again:

frontendgone3

Seems to me that there is a lot of “gap” between the tree and the cab of the car, and no wreckage in there — just empty space.

Had the car hit the tree at high speed, causing all that damage, I think the cab would be scrunched right up against the trunk. Like when they say that Jed “wrapped his Camaro around” a telephone pole.

It looks to me like the car bumped into the tree and that triggered a detonation.

Here is the Loudlabs footage:

____________

Appendix:

Note: Unless you are a Jim Stone Forum reader, this will not be significant to you.

blownoutsctn blownoutsection

Questions about the Death of Michael Hastings

According to the following article from the Los Angeles Times, Buzzfeed and Rolling Stone announced Hastings’ death on Tuesday:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-coroner-no-identification-michael-hastings-20130618,0,5825533.story

Yet, as the very URL of that article makes clear, the coroner had yet to identify the body. Absent a positive identification, how were Buzzfeed and Rolling Stone confident enough to make that official announcement?

The rest of this article will focus on a single newscast, which yields enough incoherent information to indicate that Hastings’ death was not the result of an accident. All subsequent still shots are taken from it, except for those from Google Maps.


First, according to all accounts, the car was a brand-new Mercedes.

No car will blow up from getting run into a tree, least of all a Mercedes. And yet:

rochellefran51

An eyewitness claims the blast was so intense that it shook her house and rattled her windows.

Those L.A. palm trees must be made of something more than wood. Hell, everything in Hollywood is fake anyway. Maybe those palm trees are made of some kind of plastic. Like C4.

Moving on, our next eyewitness is Hollywood producer Gary Grossman, whom we can thank for America’s Funniest Home Videos (1989):

grossman107 garygrossman109 engine113

He says the engine flew 50 or 60 yards and landed near a telephone pole. Other accounts say 100 feet. Who’s counting? How does any car, much less a Mercedes, hit a palm tree and explode with enough force to throw the engine ANYWHERE???

Vin Diesel would blush at a script like that. Not even a hack like Gary Grossman could conceive of writing it. What does that tell you?

For the record, here is Grossman’s address from the Hollywood White Pages:

grossmanaddress

546 North Highland Avenue. I decided to plop myself down there on Google Maps. Here is the scene of the “accident”, from left to right.

highland1 highland2 highland3

Do you see how SPACIOUS it is? LOOK at all that SPACE! And yet they say Hastings, in the darkness at 4:30 a.m., smashed his Mercedes into one of those toothpick palm trees with enough force to cause an explosion that sent the engine flying some distance, any distance at all. Impossible. Even in Hollyweird.

Even if a collision took place, was he blind drunk? If so, what are the odds he’d hit one of those trees? If he wasn’t blind drunk, then he was suicidal. Why would a suicidal man pick a palm tree in the middle of a residential neighborhood?

After Grossman’s testimony, we get this chilling eulogy from the talking head:

hastingsencomium130

Hastings will, likely, partially be remembered? That is very deliberately worded. Whoever had the bomb put in Hastings’ car hated him with the passion of a billion white-hot suns, and wanted to crap all over his accomplishments by delivering that insult unto his legacy.

And who has the power to make sure that the slight is worded just so, via the mainstream news?

I’ll give you a hint: the answer rhymes with “news”.

Still stumped? Oh well, take a look at who was first on the scene, except for Grossman:

jewishgroup

Here’s the first responders’ website:

http://www.hatzolahofla.org/

Make sure to turn your speakers down before you click, or they will offend your eardrums as well as every other atom of your being.

Jim Stone’s take is here: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/hastingsmurdered.html

For more on how cars do not turn into bombs upon impact with trees:

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2013/06/famed-non-automotive-journalist-michael-hastings-turns-a-c250-into-a-bomb/

_____________

Tinfoil Hat Addendum:

They waited until Hastings was 33.

Is Adam Kokesh Working for the CIA?

Is Adam Kokesh Working for the CIA?

Adam Kokesh leads a large contingent of the American “Patriot” movement. His followers are typically Second Amendment activists and Ron Paul devotees – people who are aware enough to perceive that their government does not mean them well, yet naïve enough to think that there is a political solution, whether it come via a maverick politician or displays of civil disobedience.

They lack the perspective to see the real scope of the state machine, who owns it, and the extent to which it hijacks and controls opposition.

Kokesh has been arrested for promoting such antics as a dance-in at the Jefferson Memorial and, most recently, a pro-marijuana rally in Philadelphia. But compared to his latest brainchild – an armed march on Washington, DC and all 50 state capitols – those stunts are mere child’s play.

From a tactical perspective, the concept is a nightmare. One can easily imagine the bloodbath that would inevitably result, and the subsequent justification for draconian gun control, if not a declaration of martial law.

To their credit, many patriot bloggers and alternative media figures have expressed misgivings about Kokesh’s Independance Day marches. Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association has distanced itself from the idea, and the Oathkeepers issued a statement of non-endorsement.

The blogosphere backlash was so strident, Kokesh called off the march on DC. Yet despite anemic support, he is still calling for the state capitol marches to occur.

This is perfect for Kokesh, as he is off the hook. He can’t be in 50 states at once. But he has established the pretext for an event that, should it occur, might prove to be the biggest false flag operation the U.S. “government” has ever perpetrated against the citizenry.

Troubling Details

First, think of the world financial system as a circuit board. As an electrical engineer tweaks a circuit to obtain a desired outcome, so those who generate and control the world’s currency manipulate results to their own ends. Authentic rebel leaders who have garnered too much influence can be cut off from the current, if not removed from the board altogether. By the same token, currency is routinely inducted and op-amped to fund controlled opposition.

Adam’s whole enterprise – high-profile radio show, big website, slick production, mass media attention – bears all the hallmarks of one that has been covertly facilitated, not suppressed.

Second, Adam has voiced his allegiance with the Occupy Wall Street movement. For those who didn’t get the memo yet, OWS is heavily funded by George Soros, a globalist, America-hating, plutocrat Jew.

Third, Adam Kokesh is himself – surprise, surprise – a Jew.

Many would say that is a purely ad hominem observation. I disagree.

Based on testimony from Jim Stone, who infiltrated the Canadian Jewish community, I am inclined to believe that a lot more rank-and-file Jews are “in on it” than we are led to believe.

Think about it. Out of all the brave, disgruntled Iraq veterans who might have struck a meteoric rise to celebrity anti-war dissidence … he just so happened to be a member of a tribe that constitutes a meager 0.3% of US armed forces. Go figure.

Adam served in Iraq as a sergeant in the U.S. Marines 3rd Civil Affairs Group, whose mission explicitly includes psychological operations (psy ops).

Speaking of which, the website Freeadamkokesh.com was created six days before Adam was arrested in Philadelphia on felony charges. Days later, he was released, all charges dropped.

If the authorities were worried that Kokesh posed a real threat to the government, then they would have opted to keep him locked down, don’t you think?

Then there is Charles Kokesh, Adam’s big-money con-man father, presently indicted for illegally selling two elephant tusks in Pensacola, Florida.

Mike Rivero, a good Jew, insightfully speculates that the elder Kokesh’s legal troubles could be used to pressure Adam into proceeding with the march despite the massive opposition from Patriot gun-owners across the US.

But who would be applying that pressure? Moreover, lacking any real support, how could the marches even take place?

Enter the CIA

Researcher and investigative reporter Jim Stone, a former NSA analyst, has recently estimated that the CIA has upwards of 1,500,000 operatives on its payroll.

Stone bases this number on records which he claims have been expunged from the internet.

A Google search reveals the official answer, the Wikipedia answer, and that’s about it.

The Wikipedia answer: 20,000.

The official answer:

Neither the number of employees nor the size of the Agency’s budget can, at present, be publicly disclosed. A common misconception is that the Agency has an unlimited budget, which is far from true. While classified, the budget and size of the CIA are known in detail and scrutinized by the Office of Management and Budget and by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Defense Subcommittees of the Appropriations Committees in both houses of Congress. The resources allocated to the CIA are subject to the same rigorous examination and approval process that applies to all other government organizations.

The Wiki answer is ridiculously low. When you consider the sheer range and scope of the CIA’s operations around the world, from gun-running to drug-smuggling to election-rigging to assassinations to eavesdropping on and monitoring of ever-more-wide-ranging varieties of “terrorists”, 20,000 is an insult to intelligence. Why did Wikipedia even bother stating a number at all?

The second, the official answer, is more telling. Why would the Agency want to withhold the answer, if it were not to conceal a number that would alarm a concerned Patriot? One could argue that it’s for reasons of “national security”, to which I would reply that the term “national security” is really nothing other than a carte blanche excuse to conceal any information that those bastards don’t want to divulge, for any reason at all.

It would pose no threat to the “security” of the United States if the CIA announced its payroll size. Not that the Russians and Chinese don’t know anyway.

On top of that, the official answer is full of lies which are stinkingly obvious to an increasing number of people who, thanks to scandals like Fast and Furious, not to mention all the photos of U.S. troops guarding poppy fields in Afghanistan, have wised up to some of the CIA’s criminal sources of income.

If Stone’s figure is correct – if even two-thirds of it is the real number, in fact – then we already live under the worst tyranny imaginable; the iron fists just have yet to remove their velvet gloves.

Having that many assets would enable the CIA to pull off false-flag armed marches on all 50 state capitols without involving a single genuine Patriot – level-headed opposition among the citizenry to such insanity be damned.

We must be on guard, ever watchful, and as long as we have an internet that is ostensibly free, we must use it to spread observations that incriminate false flag operatives.

As July 4 approaches, be on the lookout for campaigns in your region that slickly agitate for an armed march on your state’s capitol. If they crop up, look into the people behind them, and locate the sources of their funding. After all, it takes money to organize an event … and we know where money comes from, and how hard it is these days to come by.

If an armed march does occur in your area, be sure to document it. Upload your photos and videos and share them via social media. There is an established community of analysts on the net who will waste no time combing your documentation for signs the march was staged. The further we can pull their pants down, the less brazen they can afford to be. Stone has written a good article on the best budget cameras to use for both video and still-shot documentation via zoom lens, so you can avoid getting caught up in the drama and make a clean getaway.

Above all, beware pied pipers that get mass media attention and promise to redress your grievances. None of them is above suspicion. The state, the corporations, the military-industrial complex, and above all, the globalists, who own the media that run cover for all the above, look out for their own. We are on the chopping block.

Adam Kokesh is most certainly not the answer, but he may well be a component of their Final Solution.

______________

Tinfoil Hat Addendum:

1.

“Adam” in Hebrew means “Man”

“Adam” Vs. “The Man”

“Adam” Vs. “Himself”

“Adam” = “Establishment”

V is an inverted pyramid.

2.

Check out Adam’s Facebook profile image:

adam_one_eye

All-Seeing Eye anyone?

Hearsay and Other BS in the Three New Suspects’ Story

So they’ve arrested three new suspects, friends of Dzhokhar (sic) Tsarnaev, and charged them with obstructing justice by making misleading statements to FBI investigators, whose own affidavit against Djokar is jam-packed with statements that mislead and falsify.

Link: http://gma.yahoo.com/3-more-custody-boston-marathon-bombing-case-cops-160713928–abc-news-topstories.html

Text, with my comments indented and in blue:

Just a month before three people were killed and more than 260 others injured when a pair of bombs ripped through the crowd near the finish line at the Boston Marathon, bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev bragged to his friends that he knew how to build explosives, criminal complaints against three new suspects revealed today.

260 injured now, eh? The number just keeps climbing! Notice there are no links to the criminal complaints. Doesn’t mean they don’t exist, so I will be looking them up, but I’m not holding my breath. If the press were transparent and interested in bringing the truth, they would link to the complaints and not make me go digging for them. As it is, this is hearsay — par for the course. Even the original affidavit of complaint filed against Djokar and his murdered brother is full of hearsay. More on that later.

Buried in the footnotes of court documents filed against three friends of Dzhokhar’s is a reference to a chilling statement one of the friends, Azamat Tazhayakov, made to investigators in the days after the deadly attack.

“Tazhayakov also informed the FBI agents that while eating a meal with Dzhokhar and [friend Dias] Kadyrbayev approximately one month prior to the Marathon bombing, Dzhokhar had explained to Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov that he knew how to make a bomb,” the court documents say.

Detailed, scripted hearsay.

The statement was one of many new details to emerge today after authorities arrested 19-year-olds Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov and another friend, Robel Phillipos, for their alleged actions in the days after the bombing. All three appeared in a Boston court this afternoon.

Tazhayakov and Kadyrbayev were charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice for purportedly trying to get rid of a laptop and backpack full of fireworks belonging to Dzhokhar after one of them realized Dzhokhar may be involved in the bombing. Phillipos was charged with making false statements to federal investigators.

I’d like to see the federal investigators brought up on charges of making false statements to the court. I am working on an affidavit against them to that effect.

Also revealed in the complaint was a text message conversation between one of the friends and Dzhokhar three days after the deadly attack. That day, April 18, Kadyrbayev texted Dzhokhar to tell him he resembled a man seen in images the FBI was circulating of possible suspects in the attack, the complaint says.

Really? Can we see any evidence of that text message conversation? No, we are to believe it because Yahoo news told us.

“LOL,” replied Dzhokhar. Kadyrbayev took that and other texts like “you better not text me” to be jokes, documents say. Dzhokhar also told Kadyrbayev to take whatever he wanted from his dorm room.

Why would Djokar say that? What insinuation is this they’re trying to make? Are they implying Djokar knew his friend was onto him, and was asking his friend to destroy evidence? Then why the LOL, the “you better not text me”, assuming they are real? Would a guilty terrorist make such a jocular, oblique request that his friend destroy evidence?

Or, could it be that Djokar, knowing his own innocence, was making a shrugging statement to his friend, along the lines of:

“Search me!”

It wasn’t until the Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov and Phillipos were hanging out together in Dzhokhar’s dorm room alone that they spotted fireworks with missing powder. According to a criminal complaint, that was when Kadyrbayev “knew” his friend was involved in the attack.

Wow, they spotted fireworks with missing powder. I guess they majored in Psychic X-Ray Vision Forensics. Then they put complex calculus together and quickly deduced that their friend was the nefarious pressure cooker bomber.

Prosecutors say Kadyrbayev decided to take the backpack containing fireworks “to help his friend [Dzhokhar] avoid trouble” and took the laptop because he didn’t want Dzhokhar’s roommate to think he was behaving suspiciously. The documents assert that later Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov decided together to throw the backpack and fireworks in the trash.

Yup. Even though they already knew he was in trouble, they took his shit to help him avoid trouble. And being the bright kids they are, they simply tossed it in the trash, the first place investigators would look. But that’s not all …

Robert Stahl, an attorney for Kadyrbayev, said today his client was not aware Dzhokhar was a suspect in the bombing when he took the backpack and laptop and did not know the items might have been involved in a bombing or were of evidentiary value. Harlan Protass, an attorney for Tazhayakov, said that his client has cooperated fully with authorities and “looks forward” to the truth coming out in his case.

Yup. Even though they already knew he was in trouble, they didn’t know.

Prosecutors said Phillipos initially told federal investigators he did not remember going to Dzhokhar’s room and then said the three friends went there but did not go in. In his fourth interview with investigators, however, Phillipos “eventually confessed that he had lied to the agents,” the court documents say.

If I was getting pummeled with abusive questioning by FBI agents intent on bashing me into alignment with whatever bullshit screeplay they’re trying to produce, with horrible results if I don’t answer the questions right, I think I’d have my story mixed up too. Until I got it right.

Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov face up to five years in prison and Phillipos faces a maximum sentence of up to eight years if convicted, the DOJ said.

Yeah, way to go, federales. Way to go, assholes. Ruin some kids’ lives for being acquainted with your patsy, and maybe trying to help him in some oblique way, knowing he was set up. All for the furtherance of your bullshit script. Because that’s probably what this shakes down to.

Authorities and experts said both of the bombs that exploded April 15 were relatively unsophisticated devices, likely at least partially constructed based on instructions widely available on the internet. Dzhokhar is accused of executing the attack with his older brother, Tamerlan, who authorities say may have been in contact with Islamic militants during a 2012 trip to Russia.

A trip that only lasted a few fucking days.