Category Archives: prepping

The Next Wave In False Flag Gun Control Terror — Nuclear Sabotage?

Contact Jim Stone

The most important document ever produced by this web site is here: Nuclear Sabotage at Fukushima

To read the Fukushima report in German, Click here

Stuxnet attack on multiple nuclear facilities in the U.S. may be imminent

Want Gun confiscation to work without a fight? How about putting FEMA into overdrive with a huge nuclear disaster?

There is a reason why I produced this, it DID NOT come from Mad Magazine.

Click the cartoon for a larger version


Want gun confiscation to work? Want a reason to go door to door and expel EVERYONE from their homes? Want final tyranny lock down? How about blowing up a few nuclear facilities, as I was talking about shortly after Fukushima, and using THAT as an excuse to send Fema door to door? Blown up nuclear reactor trumps hurricane any day. That is why I published that cartoon, which was a lot of work to create. And with EXPLOSIVES ALREADY PLANTED IN A SWEDISH NUCLEAR FACILITY and a probable countless number of nuclear weapons spread across the world via one nation’s nuclear deterrent method, allowing them to nail any government via nuclear blackmail I have no doubt that the “elite” would have no compunctions about blowing up a few nuclear reactors in the U.S. to convince the American public to go along with their disaster plan, which would no doubt include total relocation of the population, and confiscations of all firearms.

They may be able to sway governments with planted nukes, but with regard to gun confiscation in America they are going to have to find a way to sway the people and a nuclear disaster may be the ticket.

Things are starting to heat up now, and THAT is why I published that cartoon. Spreading it could very well change the future. Do not let it sit here on this web site, GET IT OFF THIS SITE, RENAME IT, AND POST IT ELSEWHERE.

Use the larger version for resizing, 800 pixels is as small as you can go and have the print on the gauges be readable.

Only ignorance of the population will let them get away with what I believe is now a short term plan.


This brilliant article shows you the kind of threat we are really up against. When I was in the NSA, this was a major topic, and a man would go around the facility with a spectrum analyzer, tuning the entire radio spectrum across a display screen looking for “leaks” in the system which could be exploited exactly the way this article talks about. These scans took place every few feet, and it took days to go around the facility making sure there were no leaks. This is a reality, and there is no doubt the world’s nuclear facilities have indeed been scanned the same way via satellite, looking for leaks in their hard wired totally off the web secure LAN and PLC systems they operate with, and MANY have been penetrated and had crap put on them straight out of what would appear to be “the ether.” I am NOT joking about the Stuxnet threat, it is EXACTLY like that cartoon.

This was MORE than a major topic at the NSA, it was a way of life. There is NO SUCH THING AS “SECURE” when it comes to dealing with what I have now come to name as “that group of invasive bastards”.

The only error in that report is that they are calling it a “new era”. That crap was happening DECADES ago.

This cartoon got attention and has resulted in my being cut off from everyone via e-mail, and apparently Skype, Cell phone, and pay phones. This can be accomplished easily by simply knowing who the people I would normally call are, and killing all calls to those people from this region. Pay phones used to work, but now they just eat the money and ditch all calls, of which I have attempted at least 80 to various people, with zero connects to anything other than voice mail which can be easily arranged and is totally useless, and at that, at times people said they would be available or are normally available. Skype and direct cell call attempts appear to be useless as well.

Why such severe isolation for nailing this topic at this particular time?

Indoor Hydroponics Cannot Feed You: The Math


I am sure this will get censored under the current conditions but it is a good read for anyone. I won’t say who this is meant for, he will just know.

The math behind why you cannot be effective about growing food indoors without either a nuclear reactor or the light of the sun.

The most efficient light bulbs will only convert approximately 15 percent of the input electricity to light. Of this light, you will be lucky if you manage to get more than 75 percent of it to your plants. This means, in an ideal setup, you will get about 12 percent of your input power to the plants in a usable form.

So 1000 watts in, equals 120 watts out.

From there, the plants will convert that light into energy to grow with at a rate of approxiately 5 percent. So just from a biomass perspective, that 120 watts will then become 6.

But there is another step – a large portion of the total biomass will not be edible. The edible portion, in a best case scenario will be somewhere around 50 percent, which takes your total energy available for you to eat at about 3 watts out of an original thousand.

Average people need approximately 100 watts continuous, day in and day out, to survive. Active people will need about 200.

So to get enough light into an indoor setup, you will need, just to stay docile, 100/3 = 33.3 x 1000, or 33,000 watts worth of spent electricity going 24/7 to get enough light to cause the plants alone to feed ONE man or woman.

The sun is enormously powerful, and in the central united states, during the summer, the sun will typically put 1,100 watts worth of energy into each square meter of land during the day, an amount of energy that would take 10,000 watts of input power to cause even an efficient light source to produce. That is why plants can support us. The process of photosynthesis can be enormously inefficient, and it will not matter because the sun can really deliver.

Bottom line? If you want to feed yourself with a hydroponic setup, you have to use a standard greenhouse.

This math is not exact because I went off of memory. But the overall answer is an accurate one.