Category Archives: tsunami

James Is Not Jim Is Not Joe

james-n-jim

Last night, staying in a pension on Korea’s southwest coast, I was about to hit the hay when a Facebook friend sent me the following link:

http://therebel.org/news/andrew-macgregor/joe-vialls-ari-and-jim-stone-in-the-mouse-that-roared/

I clicked. I waited. The article wouldn’t load. I stepped outside for some fresh air. When I came back, the server had timed out. I clicked again and again. Again and again, the same result. I told my friend it would have to wait for morning and went to bed.

I am very glad that The Rebel’s server didn’t let me see this article, because it would have ruined my sleep. In it, the author, Andrew MacGregor, accuses my friend Jim Stone of being a murderer. Along the way to this libelous conclusion, he misrepresents and distorts Jim’s work. It is so ridiculous that I do not want to devote the time and effort necessary to answer it; but answer it I must. The only question now is, where to begin.

I guess I’ll start with the most nonsensical of Mr. MacGregor’s claims: that American investigative journalist Jim Stone is actually Australian investigative journalist Joe Vialls, who was actually Israeli Mossad agent Ari Ben Menashe.

First, I direct your attention to the following article, in which the writer testifies that Joe Vialls was a devoted family man and denies that he doubled as anyone else:

http://www.henrymakow.com/joe_vialls_right_was_accused.html

From the above article, here is a color picture of Joe Vialls:

Joe Vialls
Joe Vialls

Here, by contrast, is a color image of Jim Stone:

Jim Stone
Jim Stone

The latter is a screen grab from a Skype interview that Jim did with Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot in April 2012.

So, you may ask, how are you to believe that the fellow in the interview was really Jim Stone? Well, if you really don’t want to accept the easiest and most obvious conclusion — that the voice and speech mannerisms exactly match every other interview he ever gave, and he is in full command of the research and information released under that name, so it must be him — then maybe you’ll take my word for it.

You see, I know that’s Jim Stone because I spent dozens of hours talking with him on Skype after he made his escape to Mexico.

“Well,” you might then say, “but what about you, Mr. James Farganne? I googled you, and Ken Adachi says that isn’t your real name, and that you and Stone are a tag-team psy op duo and blah blah yadda yadda ya …”

Since his idiotic libel recently caused me some hardship in establishing a new connection with a fellow activist, I am going to take Ken Adachi to task in this article as well. Here is Adachi’s drivel, which I will not re-read because I just got back from my nice little trip to the coast and don’t feel like flying into an apoplectic rage:

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/jimstonejamesfarganne19sep12.shtml

Since I am asking you to accept my solemn word that the man in the Skype screen grab is in truth Jim Stone, I suppose it is time that I tell my story and establish my bona fides. I’m going to start with May of 2011, when Jim released his Fukushima Report. I can’t remember how I found it. As I was in a very dark and miserable stage of my “waking up” journey at that time, it might well have been Jeff Rense’s Labyrinth-of-Doom of a website. Rense linked to the Fukushima Report — exactly once — then removed the link and never mentioned Jim again. This bothered me at the time. I was studying the report very seriously, looking for errors, inconsistencies, weaknesses, signs of disinfo. I could find none. Jim backed his claims with aerial drone shots leaked by a site called Pink Tentacle. The footnotes were extensive and exhaustive. So in passing here I will flatly answer MacGregor’s implied question as to where Jim got his information: it’s called RESEARCH.

And to Adachi, who whines like a spoiled schoolchild that he first broke the Fukushima sabotage story and that Jim later tried to take all the credit, I make the same retort. Adachi based his claims on the testimony of his psychic friend Livingstone. There was absolutely nothing of any substance in Adachi’s article, nothing a serious seeker of truth could sink his or her teeth into. You could not show Adachi’s article to a sleeper and hope to wake them up with it. The Fukushima Report represents hundreds of hours of data collection and analysis. It includes so much hard evidence, that by even attempting to place his measly little article in the same league with it, Adachi (who would have you believe that there are chemtrail-gobbling fairies in the sky called “sylphs”) exposes himself for the egotistical dilettante that he is.

I will also note that if you look up Adachi’s teeny weeny Fukushima report, you will not find the original. The original had nothing in it but Adachi’s claims and quotes from Livingstone. Even if you try to find the damned original in the Wayback Machine, you can’t. So it would seem that Ken Adachi has some very resonant strings at his fingertips. Moving on.

As I studied Jim’s report, and as the weeks went by, I began to look suspiciously on “alternative” and “truth” websites that seemed to be studiously ignoring it. Jim had prominently posted on his front page a note stating that he answered any and all serious emails he received, and that if you received no answer, it meant he hadn’t gotten your mail. I wrote to Jim again and again and again, to no avail. Wondering if my IP had been flagged by whomever was censoring his mail, I went to internet cafes and set up bogus mailbox accounts. Nothing worked. I was miserable. I now felt that Rense and many other alternative news outlets were compromised and betraying the truth. As autumn sank into winter, I finally gave up. I was disconsolate. I felt that the internet was rigged and most of the “alternative” sites were just varying degrees of controlled opposition.

One day in early January 2012, on a whim, I gave Jim’s email address to an engineer friend and asked him to fire off a note. Jim answered, so I immediately wrote him again, referencing my engineer friend, and this time he wrote me back. His tone was friendly, brisk, and hectic. After posting the Fuku report, he had been unlawfully detained and had his vending machine business smashed up. Agents in the judicial system were trying to incarcerate him under an erroneous name. The government refused to issue him a passport. He was trying to figure out a way to escape, and the noose was tightening. Shaking off my despair and inertia, I started contacting the editors of alt news websites to see if any of them would post a writeup on Jim and the Fuku report.

The only one who answered in the affirmative was Henry Makow. He gave me a limit of 1000 words and told me two others before me had tried and failed. Henry liked my summary of the report. When he informed Jeff Rense that he was going to post it, and asked Rense to link to it, Rense flew into a rage. He ordered Henry not to post my article on his own website, or he would never link to Henry again. Henry posted it anyway. A very ugly battle between the two of them ensued. Henry then posted my followup article looking more closely at Stuxnet’s role in the attack, and a third article wherein I rebutted trolls who were claiming that Jim was a spook and not to be trusted, or that he was a fiction, or that he was me. Here are the links to those three articles, in chronological order:

http://henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
http://henrymakow.com/fukushima_-_what_really_happen.html
http://henrymakow.com/jim_stone_is_the_real_thing.html

Invigorated by my success, I stepped up my efforts to spread knowledge of the Fuku report. I was astonished at the level of resistance. Gmail locked me out of three mailboxes. My laptop was frequently hacked. I was harassed (“zapped”) via brainwaves piggybacked onto the carrier signal of my cell phone. It became at times frighteningly clear to me how serious the situation was. Powerful interests absolutely hated that report, hated Jim, and they let me know in no uncertain terms that the hatred now extended to me as well. The intimidation and harassment I experienced going to bat for Jim forever confirmed in my mind the validity of the information. While that fat-ass Alex Jones mouthed off from his slick studio down in Austin, running his limited hangout operation while perfectly free to travel around the country and consort with celebrities, this one man whom I’d befriended, and exchanged countless emails on all subjects with, was sleeping in a tent, eating from pizza restaurant dumpsters, charging his laptop at wifi cafes, intermittently having to “go dark” when they were closing in on him. When he was afraid, the fear was palpable in his words. The stories from his life were genuine. If you want a glimpse into the man’s soul, read the following essay and see what you think:

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/civilization.html

Speaking of which, I will now address the following “charge”, if you can really call it that, which people like Mr. MacGregor press against Jim: that his investigative journalism grew out of what was once a photography site. And my answer to that is a big, fat SO WHAT. Jim started out as an NSA analyst believing he was a patriot using his talents to serve his country. After leaving the NSA, he worked in a variety of different fields. At one point he was a pianist, and his album, The Minstrel, can be bought on Ebay. As his interest turned to investigative reporting, he set up a vending machine route and a photography website so that he could make a decent living while having more time to research and write. Eventually he gave up on the photography site and re-allocated it to his reports.

Again, speaking of which, his backlog is a lot more extensive that his detractors let on. When they deride and belittle his “Tainted Nightmare” report which exposed deliberate poisoning of vaccines, it betrays their intentions. There is also his earlier photo expose of the Israeli atrocity at Jenin, a report that considerably predated the current website.

Yet again, speaking of which, go to the website itself (which Google refuses to serve ads) and check out the wealth of links now posted at the top of the main page. Jim Stone has given us a lot of information, and much of it predates the Fukushima Report. The man did not just jump out of a black hole, to be, in MacGregor’s words, “introduced … to the world” in June of 2011 by Natural News.

Eventually, in April 2012, Jim managed to cross the border into Mexico with a passport issued by the World Service Authority. In an attempt to get him some money, I set up a Citibank account here in Seoul, the idea being that maybe I could place funds in it, and Jim could withdraw them in Mexico. I placed a small amount of money in it for testing purposes. Within a few days, Citibank notified me that they had closed my account. They offered no explanation, and when I pressed them for one they refused it. They also stole my fucking money. Tell me, Mr. MacGregor, was Jim Stone pulling levers in the vaulted interior of that bank, cackling with glee as he ingeniously separated me from my five dollars? Or is it more likely that Jim’s enemies are in positions of such power and influence that their monitoring agents informed them of my plan, then pulled strings at Citibank to kibosh it, no questions asked? I leave it for you to decide.

Furthermore, this man whom Mr. MacGregor calls a “conman” has never taken more in donations than he needed to survive on a very low budget in a poor country for a couple of months. I once had a lengthy Skype chat with him where he strolled his laptop through a Mexican Wal Mart and showed me how good the prices were for staples of sustenance. Once, when he was dangerously low on money, I offered to sell what little silver I have and send the cash to him. He flat-out refused to take it, insisting on the importance of having metals in case of monetary collapse, and that he would sleep in the street before taking my silver. It almost came to that. Some “conman”, eh?

I could go on and on. I’ve told my story this far just to give the reader something of myself to latch onto — the sense that there is a real guy behind the nom de guerre, who is disgusted with the state of the world, who cries when children are slaughtered and who bleeds when cut, who grew up fishing and hunting in Colorado, then in Oklahoma, where he was a varsity high school wrestler, then into the student loan mill where he earned a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and English Literature with a minor in Ancient Greek, followed by an M.A. in English Composition, a guy who got out of graduate school and realized he’d spent all that time and money unpreparing himself for life in The Machine, and who finally realized that he was congenitally incapable of making peace with it.

A guy who lived through 9/11 in NYC and less than two years later migrated to Asia vowing never to fund another missile strike.

I chose the name James Farganne (pronounced “far gone”) because there is music I’ve composed and recorded and released out there on the internet to which my real name will forever be tied. When I decided to put down the guitar and take up the (s)word, I didn’t want the music associated with my new endeavors. I wanted a clean break, a fresh start. The name came to me one day in a reverie.

At the end of the day, in this cyber-medium through which we choose to interact, we must all keep our B.S. detectors finely calibrated and make judgement calls as to whom we accept to be honest and real. I hope this article has lent weight to my testimony that the man in the screen grab is indeed Jim Stone, that I am his accomplice on a different continent, and that Mr. MacGregor is quite mistaken when he makes the claim that Stone is another manifestation of Joe Vialls.

On top of this, if you are still in doubt, review the work I have posted at this blog, and then do the same at Jim’s site. It will quickly become apparent to you (in case the slanderers have put certain ideas in your head) that Jim and I are two real and very different men with different talents and different styles.

Now I will turn my weary attention to Mr. MacGregor’s comments on the Fuku report itself:

“Jim Stone moved the centre of the earthquake and resultant tsunami, then reduced its actual size, and then brought in evidence that the Fukushima nuclear power plant had also been struck by the ‘Stuxnet Virus’, the same computer virus that had struck the Iranian nuclear power plants in the previous year. Nobody ever asked Jim where and how he actually obtained this information.”

Jim did not “move the centre” of the earthquake. Again engaging in that activity called RESEARCH, he found the Japanese seismograms, which proved the USGS ones fraudulent. The Japanese seismograms showed that there was no mag 9 quake out in the ocean. Instead, there were five simultaneous inland quakes of far lesser magnitude.

As for the tsunami, Jim did not “reduce its actual size”. He found out that the flooding did not subsume the transformers — maybe that’s what you’re talking about, otherwise I haven’t a clue.

The Fukushima Report’s footnotes made Jim’s sources abundantly clear.

“The really interesting part of Jim Stone’s explanation of the actual damage to the Fukushima Nuclear plant is that it was damaged by ‘nuclear bombs’ placed in the reactor rooms by an ‘Israeli’ inspection team. Well there goes the need for the ‘Stuxnet Virus’.”

This statement proves you didn’t study the report. Stuxnet alone was sufficient to take out Reactors 1 and 2, but Reactors 3 and 4 had been so extensively overbuilt that the virus alone would not have been sufficient to wreck them.

REACTOR 4 WAS FUKUSHIMA’S BUILDING 7. It was shut down that day, with its fuel removed.

On top of this, you’re dismissing a wealth of hard facts incriminating Mossad — too many to enumerate here. But if I had to choose one, how about this one, Mr. MacGregor? Can you explain how Israel was able to remotely monitor the containments in the wake of the attack via an illegal internet data link? How could such a link have been in place unless Magna BSP, the Dimona-based Israeli firm running security at Daiichi, put it there?

As far as I can tell, Mr. MacGregor, you have not read the Fukushima Report, and your argument that Jim Stone is in fact Joe Vialls is predicated only on your observation that Jim referenced Vialls’ articles. Is that all you’ve got? Really?

You’re a retired Australian police officer. Could the following article have done anything to provoke your baseless libel of my friend?

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/queensland.html

I’m just really grasping for some kind of motive, that’s all.

When you libel someone and denigrate their work, Mr. MacGregor, you had best be able to back it up. You gave no evidence for your allegations. I have given strong evidence against them. I have knocked the ball so hard that I doubt it is even in your court.

To download the latest (printable) edition of the Fukushima Report:

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

My Australian radio interview:

 

Reactor 4 = Fukushima’s Building 7

fkshmrctr4

Building 7 at the World Trade Center was not hit by a plane. Yet it collapsed at freefall speed on 9/11/01.

Reactor 4 at Fukushima was offline, defuelled, and disassembled on 3/11/11.

It exploded anyway.

That’s about as possible as cooking a TV dinner in an unplugged microwave oven …

… absent a bomb.

There Was No 9.0 Earthquake to Cause the Tsunami at Fukushima

This is to permalink an article by Jim Stone at http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

The original Fukushima report is HERE

Two years on, and no one has managed to find a collapsed or leaning building outside the tsunami zone in Sendai, the city hardest hit by a 9.0.

All we have is TSUNAMI DAMAGE. SHOW ME THE EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE. ZERO COLLAPSED AND ZERO LEANING BUILDINGS OUTSIDE THE TSUNAMI ZONE EQUALS NO 9.0, 8.0, OR EVEN A 7.0.

Included in this additional report, posted March 13 2013, I have the OFFICIAL USGS charts that show Sendai, according to the USGS, had peak ground accelerations in excess of 3.7 G´s.

Folks, 0.35 g´s is considered adequate to possibly collapse a skyscraper when it is rated to survive an 8.0, yet the USGS said that INLAND, NORTH OF SENDAI the ground thrust was 12.7 g´s. Sendai proper had, according to the USGS, a MINIMUM G-force exerted on it of 3.7 across every square foot of the city, which is flatulent B.S, and fortunately the Japanese seismic readings farther down this page confirm that nothing on the Japanese mainland ANYWHERE should have fallen, provided it could withstand a 6.7 richter reading, and the REAL maximum ground acceleration ANYWHERE on Japan was in fact below 0.15 g’s. Where did the USGS get 12.7 from? The original charts from both the scamming USGS and the “please help spread the truth” Japanese seismologists are here, right now, on the front page. Compare them, look at the photos of perfectly un damaged Japanese towns and cities as the tsunami arrives, and decide for yourself – WHO IS LYING, THE JAPANESE, OR THE USGS?

After Sandy Hook, do you think ANY mainstream news outlet would tell the truth about this – Japan’s 911? The original Fukushima report laid the scam perpetrated by the USGS bare – the USGS has been usurped by an enemy and is now being used to front phony geological data for political purposes.

The scam of a 9.0 is so transparent that even the smallest kitten scratch on the surface of the topic lays waste to the official story; it takes a real stroke of sheeple style blindness to overlook the fact that it was ALL TSUNAMI DAMAGE because the earthquake never happened as stated at all. And if there was no significant quake, WHERE ON EARTH DID THAT TSUNAMI COME FROM?

THIS is the official USGS quake report, which shows the five top ground accelerations measured, the USGS clearly claims that a peak ground acceleration of 12.7 g’s happened at station MYG004, which is 70 KM inland, yet puts the epicenter out in the ocean, where there are no stations to record it. The station closest to the reported epicenter, which the USGS painstakingly omits, shows that on the Japanese coast nearest the purported “epicenter”, the quake registered a 5.63 on the richter scale which corresponds to a total ground thrust acceleration of approximately 0.08 G’s. Look at this USGS report carefully, which puts the ground acceleration at station MYG004 at over 12 g’s.To put this all in perspective, a quake that produces even 1 g of ground acceleration is considered to be one that virtually NO skyscraper, highway over pass or bridge can survive. Why then did a 12 G monster do virtually nothing at all where it was measured INLAND, FAR AWAY FROM THE OCEAN?

The picture below is NOT the USGS report, CLICK THE LINK ABOVE or Here, the USGS report is a PDF.

Take a look at the REAL richter readings in the photo below, which were provided by the various seismic monitoring agencies in Japan, which prove beyond all doubt the USGS lied.

smokingun1

 

Furthermore, I got numerous shill backstabs claiming that no damage happened inland because the ocean absorbed the quake. If the ocean really could absorb a quake (it cannot) it would be irrelevant if the USGS charts were true, charts which show peak ground accelerations of 12 G’s, 3.18 g’s, and 2.7 g’s, ALL TOTALLY APOCALYPTIC READINGS, happening hundreds of miles apart ON THE JAPANESE MAINLAND. The lack of damage outside the tsunami zone proves beyond all doubt that the USGS lied with their charts, and is therefore complicit in the lie that gave creedence to the Fukushima disaster.

collagesm

 

Welcome To The PsyOpocalypse

Welcome To The PsyOpocalypse

“Apocalypse” is a word loaded with mysterious and exotic connotations. Many people associate it with harrowing visions of mayhem and destruction ushering in the End Times. In fact, “apocalypse” comes to us from ancient Greek, and it simply means “revelation” or, even more mundanely, “disclosure”; it is the noun form of apokalyptein, a common verb meaning “to uncover”, and outside of Biblical context, it could be applied to any instance of revealing things once hidden or obscure.

By light of that definition, I would say an apocalypse is well and truly upon us. Maybe not “The Apocalypse”, mind you — but there does seem to be a massive revelation underway. More and more people have Eyes to See beyond the power structure’s threadbare veneer of legitimacy. For a great many of us in the “Truth” community, this apocalypse kicked in when we were asked to believe that fumbling Arabs with boxcutters took down three World Trade Center buildings, even though they (according to officialdom) managed to hit only two. That was the beginning for me, and it was a real fork in the road, a red-pill moment, a clear choice: either I had to ignore the facts laid out before me and abandon reason for the comforts of civilized ignorance, or I had to accept that the world I had taken for real was in fact an intricate matrix of lies, and slowly process all the anger, pain, and grief of that awakening.

I lived in New York City and was in Manhattan less than a kilometer from the WTC when the first plane struck. My BS detector first went off when Bush told us that the Arabs, and by extension all Muslims, hated us “for our freedoms”. If they really hated us, I wanted to know the real reasons why. Before that, I had been completely apolitical, but that one question sent me hurdling very early on into the apocalypse now becoming apparent to so many. And it was a lonely journey. When I realized that the official story was bunk, and that my government was overrun with criminals, I was no longer exactly fun to be around at parties. Awakening became an obsession. My first wife left me, and when the cops started carrying assault rifles, I left America vowing never to return.

I chose to live and work in Korea, where I could continue my re-education with the benefits of affordable medical care, low income tax, and no need to own a car. Also the police here are still really nice. They actually smile and speak politely, even if they are getting yelled at by an irate citizen; and when I went to jail for calling powerful people on the carpet over their funding of toxic music videos directed at children, the police heard me out, reviewed my evidence, concurred, and made sure I was released.

And what was it about those videos that bothered me so much? The sudden prevalence of Luciferian and Masonic imagery, occult hand signs, the occasional Mogen David, and choreography so downright pornographic that even the kids protested in disgust. And why the sudden, radical change in the production values of K-pop? I saw it as yet another sign of apocalypse. All the dark shit previously rolled out in western pop music culture was now being pushed on Asian audiences, upon people with by and large no ability to recognize the symbols, but enough sense to know that something dark this way had come, and it definitely had not come here from within. I can’t count how many times I have brought up the Masonic/Luciferian culture creep with Koreans both young and old, and they have been unanimous in pointing out that it is a foreign influence on their culture, and they don’t much like it.

I have also been surprised at how many have immediately brought up Masonry and “The Illuminati”: another sign that apocalypse is underway. Even a couple of years ago, I would never have attempted discussion of such topics with Korean acquaintances, much less most of my fellow expats. All that has changed in a very big way. Quite a few times, for example, when mixing with an expat crowd, I have calmly and assuredly stated that the Fukushima event on 3-11-11 was no natural disaster, but an Israeli attack on Japan. Instead of being shunned or told to don a tinfoil hat, I was able to open a real discussion every time I brought it up. I also taught lunchtime English classes at a Korean insurance company where all the students wanted to discuss, in every single lesson, was “the conspiracy”! I no longer feel cautious about asserting (with a smile, of course) that the “official stories” of 9-11 and 3-11 were rank bullshit. I think that most people, at some deep level, know this to be true, but it takes someone else to say it before they’ll admit it. This new freedom to discuss “conspiracy” is yet another clear sign of apocalypse.

One salient feature of apocalypse is this: like one of the favorite symbols of the power elite, it is best visualized as a Rising Sun. People become more aware, more conscious, in direct proportion to the swelling of the dawn. Reared in the darkness of indoctrination and mass mind control, taught to ridicule those who raved about a thing called Sun, fewer and fewer of us are able to ignore what is becoming painfully obvious: that all the appearances we believed in from childhood have been just that: appearances. And as the Sun rises, it will be burning those appearances away with a breadth and magnitude that only the truly blind will fail to perceive.

And then, as I did in the wake of 9-11, more and more People Who See are going to have to start making choices. Hard choices. You see, this apocalypse is not happening by accident. I am a believer that the power elite — the designers, programmers, and managers of this mental prison matrix that we call “society” — operate by a twisted code of honor requiring that they notify their victims; and if the victims do not protest, if the victims do not take measures to defend themselves, then the elites’ actions are justified. I am by no means arguing the fairness of this outlook, only observing that it seems to me to be a principle by which they operate.

In the preceding paragraph, I should have said that this apocalypse is not happening entirely by accident, meaning neither is it totally under “their” control. This is good news for all of us, if true. The bad news is, such things as RFID implants, thanks to apocalypse, are no longer “wingnut”, “tinfoil hat” topics; and as their advent becomes more and more obvious, you ignore them at your peril; AND, even if you don’t ignore them, and you happen to live where the chipping agenda is getting rolled out … again, HARD CHOICES. But the good news is that, from what I can see, this apocalypse has lately been rife with revelations coming to the public consciousness via absurd blunders and other developments which I doubt the elites intended. Consider:

Ever growing numbers of us no longer see a President when we look at Obama; rather, we see him for the dictator and the lying, liberty-destroying communist scumbag traitor that he is. Is it by design that Obama is so hated that the Marines must be disarmed at his Inauguration? Is it part of the plan that millions of gun owners hate him and his administration at a time when he is supposed to be stripping them of their weapons? Possibly. But the difficulties the current regime has been facing come in the wake of two “mass shootings” that were supposed to pave the way for disarmament, but failed miserably: Aurora, which drew a surprising amount of suspicion that it was a false flag, and possibly a wag-the-dog event, meaning it never happened; and Sandy Hook, which was such transparent bullshit, hardly anyone with an honest view of Uncle Sam could have been fooled. Anyone who saw “Robbie Parker” grinning and leering before “getting into character” as a grieving parent could see Sandy Hook exactly for what it was: a staged media event, with paid actors, and a plot so full of holes as to serve as a scathing indictment of America’s education system (they can’t even get smart enough people to pull off their psy ops convincingly any longer!). I don’t think the sloppy execution was intended, and I don’t think they foresaw the massive scorn that event provoked from the gun-owners of America.

And what of the growing numbers who can now look beyond the Obama hood ornament to see that the driver of the car wears a yarmulka? In my recent interactions with Koreans and westerners alike, I have detected a distinct uptick in awareness that Israel has pretty much taken over the Washington establishment, and where I live, it’s no big deal to observe that “the Jews run Hollywood.” I have struck up conversations with older Koreans on subway trains and told them that the real enemies are not their brethren to the North, and could they guess who the real enemy is? I was shocked by the number of times they answered, without so much as a blink: “Yes, it’s the Jews.” Suffice it to say that Koreans have no love for Jews or Israel, they are certainly unhampered by “holocaust” guilt, and if Zionist Jews wish to pursue their full-scale agenda in a country like this, right down to the tyrannical impositions of Agenda 21, it won’t be as easy as brainwashing and shaming North Americans and Europeans. It is my theory that this difficulty was foreseen and accounts for the fact that this country is still technically at war, with the DMZ still being the most heavily militarized border on the face of the Earth. If the Koreans don’t consent to have their society eaten away by Zionist and Luciferian rot, they’ll just start a big fucking war and try to pummel them into abject submission.

Anyway, their attempts to push Luciferian culture and sexual promiscuity on Korean youth (a sign of apocalypse) have failed. Assuming that Korea is not unique in its resiliency, this tells me the elites are not unveiling their shite “cult”ure to universal acclaim. So, although Koreans ultimately might be decimated for their recalcitrance, I count developments here on the “good news” side of apocalypse.

Moving along. When we look at politicians, bankers, and business executives, I think more and more of us than ever before no longer see respectable pillars of society; rather, we see them for what they actually are: murderous thugs, shameless shysters, and two-bit scammers in three-piece suits. The rapid acceptance of the neologism “bankster” into our lexicon most immediately reflects how their victims have come to perceive them. They are no better than John Gotti or Al Capone. In fact, when you consider the magnitude of their crimes, and the fact that common mafiosi at least observe a moral code, the banksters are a hell of a lot worse. At least mobsters do not enslave whole populations with fiat currency, fractional reserve banking, and odious usury; nor do they sack entire nations, robbing the people of their land, their resources, their homes, their livelihoods, and their retirement funds. The banksters are the worst group of criminals the world has ever known, and I can’t think of too many people I know who fail to see that by now.

And take the British royal family. When you look at them, are you any longer bamboozled by aristocratic pretensions? If you’ve been paying an ounce of attention to British politics, one glance at Prince Charles ought to evoke shroudy images of child molestation — and worse. The British royals have had their images permanently besmirched by their intimate relations with child molester and paedophile Jimmy Savile, who also “procured” children for them.

And when I, for one, look at the LAPD “officials” in charge of dispensing lies, lies, and more lies to the lying (and/or clueless) windbags that masquerade as journalists these days, I see those cops for what they are, and have been for a very long time: small, vicious criminals in uniform. They are organized, they are armed to the teeth, they are corrupt to the core of their being, and until now, they have enjoyed the cover of respectability that their badges afforded them.

But no longer. This is where apocalypse is in our favor, for now their pants are down for all to see. They’ve found Dorner’s wallet in three different locations, including among the cinders of the cabin they were overheard to have deliberately torched. They are known to have driven a fleeing figure, now identified as Dorner, back into the fire, to be burned alive. Never mind all the inconsistencies of the official story; never mind the obvious and ridiculous lies; never mind that they replaced his cogent original manifesto with an obvious fake designed to make him look like a raving madman: at the end of the day, assuming there was a suspect named “Dorner”, and that he was running away, now we are given to understand in the most blunt terms possible that, in the new America, the America of the Apocalypse, the cops are judge, jury, and executioner. There it is, folks, it could not possibly be more obvious. The good news? I don’t think the tomfoolery is intentional. I agree with Jim Stone, who opined that “Dorner” was detected writing his manifesto, in which he threatened only to expose the crimes of the LAPD in a court of law, and had to be dealt with in a hurry. And because cops are not the brightest bulbs on the tree, they fucked up. Badly. Score another one for the bright side of apocalypse!

Which leads to the question: how many will exercise due appreciation at being shown such hard truth in broad light of day, and have the courage to stand up and call bullshit on this whole disgusting “Dorner” farce? If not enough voices do just that, and do it every time the ruling criminals concoct another cheap wag-the-dog Batman Sandy Hook Dorner flim-flam FANTASY, then by sheer attrition, by chipping and chipping away, they will eventually succeed in justifying each new step in their “totalitarian tiptoe” agenda. Some people are going to have to get hurt. Some people will have to die. But hey, apocalypse doesn’t happen very often, so I think the occasion is going to demand that we go to extremes if we are to survive it. The point I guess I am trying to make, overall, is that, as I see it, we do have a chance.

Fukushima – What Really Happened

Fukushima – What Really Happened

February 1, 2012

As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got shut off.

by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

Recently, I posted a short overview of Jim Stone’s Fukushima report, which concluded that the 9.0-magnitude quake was a lie concocted to conceal the real cause of the tsunami: a seabed nuke.

Stone’s report proves definitively that the official story of 3/11, like that of 9/11, is a poorly woven fabric of lies and inconsistencies.

Drone photos show that the containment walls of Reactors 1, 3, and 4 were obliterated. Concrete walls 4 – 8 feet thick were blown to dust, leaving only skeletal rebar. Hydrogen, at such low pressure, could never have wrought such massive destruction. It would defy laws of physics, as well as historical precedent.

The destruction of Reactor 4’s containment walls was a clear case of sabotage. It had no fuel in it, so it was not operating. Yet it blew sky high. Reactor 3 vanished completely, core and all, after exploding into a mushroom cloud.

Claims by Arnie Gundersen that the explosions resulted from “prompt criticality” don’t wash. Reactor core meltdowns do not produce mushroom clouds. Nuclear weapons do that. Moreover, Gundersen, “expert” mouthpiece for the MSM and alternative media outlets, has been outed by real professionals in his field as a fraud.

The foregoing facts are clear enough to the untrained eye. More subtle are signs of sabotage within the power plants’ control systems. Seeing these takes more brainpower. You need to visualize the unfamiliar. You have to find out what switch gear is. There’s a dry official report to hump through, diagrams at which to squint. You have to scroll toward the bottom of Stone’s report for this section. It has no proper title. Just keep your eyes peeled for the first sentence:

“Fukushima was impossible.”

This section was the kernel of Stone’s investigation. It is a crystalline lattice of logic and evidence that obliterates the official story of the reactors’ destruction as completely as the reactors were themselves destroyed.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

According to officialdom, the reactors exploded because the cores overheated. The emergency cooling systems failed because the backup generators were flooded by the tsunami.

All of this is bogus. First, a careful reading of an official report from the World Nuclear Association reveals that the tsunami did not flood the generators. There was another cause for their malfunction.

Second, three of the nine cooling systems needed no electricity. They used steam power from the reactor cores. They were the real emergency systems. Swamped generators would therefore have been irrelevant.

Third, these three passive systems kicked in at Reactors 1 and 3.  Then the valves that fed them steam were shut. This required a command. It was a deliberate act.

Who, or what, shut those valves?

The most likely answer points to Dimona, Israel’s “nuclear research” center.

ENTER STUXNET

Israeli security firm Magna BSP landed a security contract at Fukushima Daiichi shortly after Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon after Magna BSP arrived, cybersecurity giant Symantec reported that the Stuxnet virus had infiltrated thousands of computers in Japan.

This is significant because Stuxnet is an Israeli invention.  Magna BSP, an Israeli firm, had no previous history outside of contracts with Dimona, where the Stuxnet virus was born.

Stuxnet works by disrupting industrial hydraulics, the pipes and valves that drove Fukushima’s cooling systems. Stuxnet runs amok while sending normal readings to the engineers at their control stations. Israel is documented to have used this virus to damage centrifuges at a nuclear facility in Iran.

The cooling systems at Fukushima were controlled by Siemens software, which the Stuxnet virus was designed specifically to attack.

Stuxnet can be administrated via the kind of data link that Magna BSP installed before scramming back to Israel just prior to the disaster.

As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got shut. It explains why engineers are still getting containment pressure readings from Reactor 3, even though the containment is no longer there, and it explains a lot of other things as well.

If you want to debunk the Stuxnet hypothesis, you’re going to have your work cut out for you. If Stuxnet was a duck, then everything about what happened at Fukushima would be quacking like one.

CONCLUSION

On 3/11/11, Reactors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were utterly destroyed, with 1, 3, and 4 suspiciously exploding.

Though Stone only got direct evidence of a nuke planted at Reactor 3, which produced the mushroom cloud, it is rational to believe Reactors 1 and 4 also had them, with 4 exploding even though it had no fuel core installed at the time.

The lesser magnitude of the explosions at Reactors 1 and 4 can be attributed to the fact that gun-type nukes are not consistent in their yield. Reactor 3’s detonation might also have gotten a boost from the pressure released in a reactor pressure vessel breach — a sensible conclusion in that the reactor is completely gone. Stuxnet appears to have affected all of the reactors’ control systems, crippling generators and shutting valves. Problems at Reactor 2 appear to be Stuxnet-related only. All four were fatalities.

But of course, don’t take my word for it. Go and study the report for yourself.

Our First Article on Stone’s Report prompted this Hit Piece in the MSM, Wired.com

The Article Jeff Rense Doesn’t Want You To Read

http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html

Why doesn’t Jeff Rense want you to examine the evidence for yourself?

If Stone’s report is so ridiculous, you’d think Rense would want to expose its absurdity.

If Stone’s report is such an easy target, why has no one bothered to debunk it, point by point?

_____________

The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged

January 27, 2012

(Jeff Rense refused to link to this article. He thinks it is a psy-op to absolve the nuclear industry of blame for Fukushima. Fine. But when I posted it anyway so people could decide for themselves, he announced he would no longer link to my site. You will no longer find my work on Rense’s site. Sad that a 10 year relationship should end in this fashion. See, “The Hidden Jeff Rense.” and “Jeff Rense Steps in It.“)  

Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear bombs in the sea and the Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in cameras installed by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illuminati diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by James Farganne in the spirit of free discussion. 

camera.jpg.
———————————————————————————————————-

by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

When we compare the  6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.

A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.

The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.

It sent a 15-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges, houses, roads, and cars — over a populace which had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, because there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. They were taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.

What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren’t they warned? Why was there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?

The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by it.

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.

Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.

But don’t take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube.  Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.

Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.

The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake — made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been another cause.

blast door.jpgReactors Destroyed by Nukes

It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant personnel.

Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational — yet it exploded and was destroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center – an utter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.

Israeli Involvement

In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran’s nuclear program. Magna BSP also established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.

All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.

Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth

What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?

Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.

Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.

The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the tsunami’s aftermath.

Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.

Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.

Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.

I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.

No one has debunked him yet.

His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.

Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?

Why haven’t more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?

Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That’s irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.

If you haven’t done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone’s Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the alternative media’s silence on it.

To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed the truth.

The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ